'The Virus'-The lie

Perhaps, at this juncture, some nine months into the COVID Scare of 2020, the only thing that will emancipate people from the fear—the pathological, obsessive, wildly irrational fear—that has consumed them for the better part of this year is access to a vaccine.

Personally, and while I am not now nor have I ever been an “anti-vaxxer,” I will not go anywhere near any so-called COVID vaccine. The reason for this is simple enough:

Since “the Virus” has never been isolated, purified, and extracted from the bio-chemical soup in which scientists claim to have found it; since, that is, COVID-19 has never been identified with the exactness and rigor demanded by the scientific method, it’s anyone’s guess as to what would be included in an alleged vaccine.

That COVID has never been scientifically determined is borne out by two indisputable facts:

(1)The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention itself concedes, way down on the 39^th page of its 59 page report—“CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel”—that the Virus’s existence has not been proven.

Of course, the report doesn’t say this in so many words. What it does say, within a section with the title, “Performance Characteristics,” is that “no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available [.]”

To repeat: the “experts” are here admitting to us, albeit in a document that few people are going to read and buried deeply within it to boot, that they possess zero “quantified…isolates” of the virus that they have had us believe for most of this year is the second iteration of the Bubonic Plague.

So, the Virus hasn’t been measured and it hasn’t been isolated—the two things that must happen in order to confirm the existence of any virus, to say nothing of a “novel” virus.

It is precisely because, as the CDC confesses, the Virus has never been proven that it prescribes PCR testing—instead of the blood serum testing that it should and would be employing had it determined the existence of the Virus through the scientific method according to which viruses are determined.

And the PCR test is intended to detect RNA that “the experts” assume is embodied by the Virus that they concede they have never isolated!

(2)There are two things concerning that PCR test of which to take note:

First, Kary Mullis, the man who invented the PCR test and who in 1993 won a Nobel Prize for doing so, was interviewed by John Lauritsen three years later. He made the following revealing judgment regarding his invention:

“Quantitative PCR is an oxymoron.”

An oxymoron is a contradiction in terms. In other words, the PCR test, while it may detect the presence of material, cannot detect the amount of it.

In other words, and although the Fake “Fact-Checkers” of the leftist press deny that Mullis implied that his test was never designed for the purpose to which it’s being deployed at the present moment, Mullis did indeed imply just that.

Jon Rappoport is an investigative journalist who has been writing on epidemics and pandemics for about 35 years. In 2014, during the Ebola virus scare, Rappoport, while quoting Mullis’s own declaration regarding his invention, noted the flaws of the PCR test. He asked:

“Is the sample taken from the patient actually a virus or a piece of a virus? Or is it just an irrelevant piece of debris?”

He also noted that the “test is based on the amplification of a tiny, tiny speck of genetic material taken from a patient—blowing it up millions of times until it can be observed and analyzed.”

The significance of this can’t be overstated. It requires “millions and millions” of a virus—it requires, that is to say, quantification—to determine whether a person is sick, or will become sick. Yet, as Karry Mullis unequivocally stated, his PCR test precludes quantification.

And, of course, not long ago, even that dastardly right-wing publication known as The New York Times revealed that the PCR test has a false-positive rate as high as 90%! This is due to the fact that it is almost always administered according to the CDC’s recommendation that it be run through an excessively large number of cycles that, as none other than the sainted Dr. Fauci himself acknowledged, is guaranteed to deliver a false-positive result (“dead nucleotides”).

The bottom line is this:

Even if, counterfactually, the Virus had been found, the PCR test would still have proved worthless in determining whether anyone was sick, and almost as worthless, given the (undoubtedly politicized) manner in which it’s been administered, in proving the rate of infection.

The Government-Media-Industrial complex’s breathless sensationalizing of the most recent explosion of “case numbers” is surely designed to pump even more fear into the already terror-stricken hearts of the millions of Americans whose lives over which power-hungry politicians and their propagandist apologists in the Fake News industry have assumed control during the course of this past year. This extra dose of fear is guaranteed to corral them into mile-long lines for the Virus “vaccine.”

So be it. If it liberates them from their fear and restores our country to some semblance of pre-COVID normalcy, then it would be a good thing.

However, if those who have been hiding behind their (wholly ineffective) masks for months weren’t consumed by an irrationality that has proven to be impenetrable, I’d urge them to inquire into the contents of this drug that they’ll be climbing over one another to have “experts” inject into their bodies.

Since, though, it has long been obvious that the irrationality of the True Believers in the Virus most definitely is immovable, it is only for the remotely stable that I write this article.

Covid was isolated earlier this year.

Identification of Coronavirus Isolated from a Patient in Korea with COVID-19 11 Feb 2020.
Virus Isolation from the First Patient with SARS-CoV-2 in Korea 18 Feb 2020.
I study viruses: How our team isolated the new coronavirus to fight the global pandemic 25 March 2020.

Kerwick is misreading this part on page 59:

The analytical sensitivity of the rRT-PCR assays contained in the CDC 2019 Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel were determined in Limit of Detection studies. Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV were available for CDC use at the time the test was developed and this study conducted, assays designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA [ skipping medical jargon ]...

.... A preliminary LoD for each assay was determined testing triplicate samples of RNA purified using each extraction method. The approximate LoD was identified by extracting and testing 10-fold serial dilutions of characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full-length RNA. A confirmation of the LoD was determined using 3-fold serial dilution RNA samples with 20 extracted replicates. The LoD was determined as the lowest concentration where ≥95% (19/20) of the replicates were positive"

Not having isolates available to develop a test is not the same thing as the virus not existing. That testing and diagnosing Covid has lots of problems is a separate from the existence of the virus.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.