Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ChicagoConservative27

>>$600 direct payment to most Americans — but eliminate a $300 per week employment benefit favored by a bipartisan group of Senate negotiators.

Tell those who are unemployed that they’d be getting 2 $300 checka and they shouldn’t be able to double dip as they did when they were getting the $800 checks AND the $1200 one.


3 posted on 12/09/2020 6:02:12 AM PST by a fool in paradise (Who built the cages, Joe?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: a fool in paradise

That would be $300 per week not just two $300 checks.
I hate to agree with Collins, my former Maine Senator. but I do.
But I’m retired, don’t need the personal check, although I’ll spend it.
No member of my family is unemployed but a lot here in Florida are.
Larry


5 posted on 12/09/2020 6:07:51 AM PST by larryjohnson (FReepersonaltrainer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: a fool in paradise

I became unemployed in March 2020..was told that they had to let me go because I was highest paid (hard to believe that with the size of the checks I would get every 2 weeks)and they couldn’t afford my salary during the lockdown. I immediately applied for and received unemployment. No, I did not make more than when I was working. I have continuously applied for jobs since then and nothing. Nobody is hiring.

Tell me, am I supposed to be able to exist on a one-time $600 payment with no further unemployment funding? Perhaps your views would change if you were in my situation. Easy to sit there and call me a bum, but you have no idea what you’re talking about.


19 posted on 12/09/2020 7:47:26 AM PST by jpp113
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson