Previous judges would not hear voter fraud cases, deciding that, if they were to consider Trump’s claims,
they would run the risk of “disenfranchising” Biden voters...a singularly dishonest argument. Disenfranchisement
occurs when people are deprived of the right to vote. No one was "deprived" of the vote here.
No one can disenfranchise an illegal voter, particularly when that “Biden voter” is
<><> dead,
<><> an amorphous computer algorithm,
<><> or a form mfg in a Chinese print shop submitted as a vote.
“ A BRILLIANT LEGAL ATTACK: Trump is asking the USSC to make “every legal vote count,” that the court invalidate illegal votes.”
Not accurate with this case.
TX is asking SCOTUS to officially rule on the 4 States who unconstitutionally changed their voting laws, which resulted in them disenfranchising the votes of States who did it correctly. TX is being joined by multiple other States, which will make it more difficult for them to ignore the suit when the 4 States respond with “Racism! Covid!”.
I’ve never understood how Democrats could state- with a straight face- that stringent ballot requirements would only “disenfranchise” their votes, unless they knew the suspect ballots were all for them.
Throwing out questionable ballots should, in theory, remove votes for all candidates. Yet, they never reply with the stronger rhetoric of “you (Republicans) would be disenfranchising your own voters.”