Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: WhoisAlanGreenspan?

The Jay Sekulow show has only been talking about this case for their full hour.

They actually mentioned this possibility on their show yesterday, which they described as an “original jurisdiction” issue that could be filed by a state that had a clean election.

The overall premise is that the legally voting state has seen it’s votes “watered down” by states that did not conduct legal elections themselves.

Sekulow believes this case is not only strong, but wraps the whole Presidential fiasco conveniently into one case for the SCOTUS.

The other case, involving just judge Alito so far, is now far less likely to provide the overall remedy that we seek, and that case is actually somewhat contradictory with regard to the potential remedy of the Texas case.

So all eyes on this case, most probably for now.

You can watch the replay here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f0YwuBz1PNU

He said they would come back on live of the SCOTUS took some action today.


139 posted on 12/08/2020 10:08:27 AM PST by Golden Eagle (********** MERRY CHRISTMAS ***********)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies ]


To: Golden Eagle

Bookmark


143 posted on 12/08/2020 10:28:49 AM PST by Irish Eyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies ]

To: Golden Eagle
He said they would come back on live of the SCOTUS took some action today.

Does SCOTUS have any time limit? Can they put this off till Feb if they wanted?

157 posted on 12/08/2020 12:35:52 PM PST by Fawn ("My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge" Hosea 4:6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson