Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind

“Their primary complaint involves the Dominion ballot marking devices. They say that those machines are susceptible to fraud. There’s no reason they could not have followed the administrative procedure act to object to the rulemaking authority that had been exercised by the secretary of state. This suit could have been filed months ago when the machines were adopted,” Batten said.

1. We kinda thought they would pay according to Hoyle. Now that they haven’t you’re saying we should have objected to a crime that hadn’t been committed?

2. Yer a dick


4 posted on 12/07/2020 12:29:51 PM PST by Vendome (I've Gotta Be Me https://youtu.be/wH-pk2vZG2M)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Vendome

Had nearly identical thoughts. Not sure where this Department of Pre-Crime comes from... Is the Judge related to Kreskin?


22 posted on 12/07/2020 12:53:36 PM PST by Dead Corpse (A Psalm in napalm...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson