Along with Murdock induced corruption, this could also show a peculiarity about the WSJ: its reporting and editorial opinion parts are separate, normally a good thing. However, when "straight" reporting becomes blatantly false, unsupported, counter-factual opinion, the responsible "reporters" ought to be fired.
Folks, if the seized German server story is true, then Trump got 410 electoral college points and over 100 million Americans voted for him. That means 100 million people don't believe the MSM and haven't for a LONG TIME.
I know it's infuriating to watch the MSM try to spin this, but IT DIDN'T WORK IN THE ELECTION AND IT'S NOT WORKING NOW.
The tide is turning in our favor, and I expect there are a lot more "Ruby videos" in other states that are going to be released. Drip. Drip. Drip.
And stop being obsessed with "dealines." FRAUD NEGATES EVERYTHING. Any contract or transaction obtained through fraud is illegal.
Once electoral fraud in a state that has certified the election is proved, then that certification is illegal.
FRAUD NEGATES EVERYTHING.
Utter lies. Ray Smith, an Attorney in GA went thru a detailed list of
different types of voter fraud based on Voter Registration forms.
ALL FACTS. REAL FRAUD.
Keep saying that stupid lie, you liars. You just keep losing your credibility and look like the liars you are. You will never gain any credibility for anything you say. What a bunch of moron propagandists.
Every day goes by, there has been more and more evidence to support the Trump team's claims.
This is why these election stealing scoundrels and liars wanted Pres. Trump to concede early. They wanted all their illegal activity to be forgotten and swept under the rug.
Is Ballhaus her real name or her stage name?
Shove it out their asses. Time for war.
The proof is from coast to coast, it’s overwhelming in scope, it even includes video tape that is so damning, it alone should overthrow results in Georgia.
The only place they are ‘unsupported’ is by the media
Where the f were they when the left was pushing the russia interfered with the 2016 election hoax? Where were they when Hillary was out there saying the Russians rigged the election to help trump win the election? I don’t remember them coming against Hillary or anybody on the left side spewing those effing lies! That’s why the media has become the number one enemy of the American people...I HATE THE EFFIN MEDIASNAKES!!! HHHHAAAATTTTEEEE THEM with a PASSION!! None of them better cross my path EVER cause I’ll give them a piece of my mind and a piece of my 🤛!
The author is a liar. “Unsupported claims”?
He is on the CWII list.
With this kind of deception abounding, Trump just cannot surrender, bend the knee. We as a nation will be finished forever. This is the hill to take a stand on. No more can this be allowed. Draw the sword, throw away the scabbard, as it were. Whatever it takes.
To those who ignored the evidence and try to push the other narrative,
we’re not stupid and won’t be placated by poor excuses.
And to those people who supported the other narrative in any role,
we are observing and your credibility is gone.
And when does someone finally tell Mr Biden that ill intended people advanced him in the Democrat primary over his opponents, and then more bad people joined in rigging the Presidential election? And unless you want to become the face of their election fraud to the nation and the world, you’re best bet is to concede as even more fraud details are uncovered everyday.
Since when does _news_ add “unsupported claims” and such propaganda to titles, regarding what President or even a candidate says?
Answer: since USA became a communist country.
Non-fake, real news, provides news, news titles, not opinions.
The WSJ is just another media lap dog of the New World Order.
Nothing more and nothing less.
If this is an editorial, I guess it is fine. But if it is supposed to be ‘news’ I take issue with the word ‘unsupported’. There has been a lot of evidence put forward that, if true, supports President Trump’s claim that the election is stolen. Is the evidence disputed, yes it is. But had they used the word ‘disputed’ that would have implied that there are two sides to this story. By using ‘unsupported’ they are saying there is only one side, so shut up!
They are not saying it to just President Trump, they are saying SHUT UP! to all of us. Don’t know if we’re going to, though.
Ministry of Truth.
Narrative terms are decreed.
Unsupported.
Unfounded.
Groundless.
Baseless.
"Ventriloquist's dummies", kind of like Charlie McCarthy and Murphy Brown, eh?So where is The Wall Street Journal’s evidence that the voter fraud claims are “unsupported”?
“Unsupported claims”? They have stacks of notarized affidavits, and numerous eyewitnesses have been testifying in open hearings in several states, not to mention expert testimony regarding statistical anomalies. How is that “unsupported”? It’s a lot more solid than anything in the Russia collusion claim.