[Sense]

I think you’re missing the point that a fraud doesn’t cease being a fraud... only because some arbitrary timeline is exceeded. The fraud... addressed in a civil suit... isn’t prevented from being heard by a court because some third party candidate for office has some other issue with the electoral process or the laws governing it ?

Sidney isn’t a candidate... so the expiry of a timeline that perhaps matters to some candidate... has no significance in relation to her status, or her claims ?

You’d have to ask separate questions... about the harms done that she’s addressing... and the remedies available ?

As a non-candidate... the electoral calendar doesn’t apply to Sidney Powell’s case...

[Boise3981]

Fraud doesn't stop being fraud. But most of these cases (including Giuliani's) keep specifically saying they're not alleging fraud.

You're kind of right... "As a non-candidate the electoral calendar doesn’t apply to Sidney Powell’s case". Kind of. But the electoral calendar DOES apply to the actual candidates. So if she proves something after the EC has voted... it's too late to change the result. If her case isn't resolved by the time the EC votes, it'll be dismissed as moot.

In a case about electoral law, the electoral calendar is going to apply to everyone.