Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Boise3981
said, " SCOTUS told Florida they could, regardless of what Gore wanted."
Yeap. I agree in that case. In this case there is a discrepancy on proper procedure by the state officials.
166 posted on 12/08/2020 12:09:16 AM PST by Steve Van Doorn (*in my best Eric Cartman voice* 'I love you, guys')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies ]


To: Steve Van Doorn
Yeap. I agree in that case. In this case there is a discrepancy on proper procedure by the state officials.

In Florida 2000 Gore said there was a discrepancy on proper procedure by state officials too. Florida said "no there's not. We're certifying."

In Pennsylvania 2020 Trump says there's a discrepancy on proper procedure by state officials. Pennsylvania will say "No there's not. We're certifying."

Safe harbor, like the election in general, is up to the states. If they say they're done, they're done. If none of the governor, secretary of state, or state legislature object, then the results will go forward. Bush v. Gore is spot on as far as precedent.
170 posted on 12/08/2020 6:08:30 AM PST by Boise3981
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson