To: Boise3981
said, " SCOTUS told Florida they could, regardless of what Gore wanted."
Yeap. I agree in that case. In this case there is a discrepancy on proper procedure by the state officials.
166 posted on
12/08/2020 12:09:16 AM PST by
Steve Van Doorn
(*in my best Eric Cartman voice* 'I love you, guys')
To: Steve Van Doorn
Yeap. I agree in that case. In this case there is a discrepancy on proper procedure by the state officials.
In Florida 2000 Gore said there was a discrepancy on proper procedure by state officials too. Florida said "no there's not. We're certifying."
In Pennsylvania 2020 Trump says there's a discrepancy on proper procedure by state officials. Pennsylvania will say "No there's not. We're certifying."
Safe harbor, like the election in general, is up to the states. If they say they're done, they're done. If none of the governor, secretary of state, or state legislature object, then the results will go forward. Bush v. Gore is spot on as far as precedent.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson