Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Sorry, but Section 230 has become a disaster. Big tech companies can censor and act as a publisher without any liability that would normally attach to a publisher.

And, yeah, places like Yelp and Twitter that allow falsehoods slander to travel multiple times around the world while the truth barely makes it out there, do need to bear some responsibility for ruining people's lives. Just look at Nick Sandmann, for goodness' sake.

Monopolisitc sites like Twitter, Google and FB need to be reigned in to allow competition to flourish.

1 posted on 12/02/2020 10:46:08 AM PST by Behind Liberal Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Behind Liberal Lines

Sorry, Rick, if they abuse it (and they have...MASSIVELY) they lose it.


2 posted on 12/02/2020 10:48:07 AM PST by House Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

I remember when N R was actually good, thoughtful and logical. That was thousands and thousands of years ago when W F Buckley ran it.

Dropped my subscription when they decided that RINO was the way to go.


4 posted on 12/02/2020 10:53:27 AM PST by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

Screw NR and Santorum.....they have no clue how irrelevant they are


5 posted on 12/02/2020 10:54:51 AM PST by The Fop (God Bless Donald Trump, Frank Sinatra, Joan Rivers, and the Fightin' Rat Pack Wing of the GOP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

why do we have to have liberla/conservative facebooks?

why cant there simply be a “facebook” that doesnt get involved in politics at all? This way people can still stay connected with their friends.

maybe FB should start allowing tags on posts i.e. politics/sports/memes etc... so people can simply “block” from seeing posts that arent of interest to them. I know for a fact 100% that my sis-in-law would like to block ALL political posts and probably most sports posts if she could—regardless of political affiliation


6 posted on 12/02/2020 10:56:45 AM PST by Jaysin (Trump can’t be beat, if the Democrats don’t cheat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

There has to be some way to make this law a protection against torts, as it was originally intended, instead of a license to swing elections, and Twitter and Facebook et al have used it. IANAL, but surely this can be done by smart lawyers. If not, then I say repeal Section 230, and let the lawsuits fly. It will then be settled by the courts.


7 posted on 12/02/2020 10:59:05 AM PST by backwoods-engineer (But what do I know? I'm just a backwoods engineer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
Attempt #2.

There has to be some way to make this law a protection against torts, as it was originally intended, instead of a license to swing elections, as Twitter and Facebook et al have used it. IANAL, but surely this can be done by smart lawyers. If not, then I say repeal Section 230, and let the lawsuits fly. It will then be settled by the courts.

8 posted on 12/02/2020 11:00:12 AM PST by backwoods-engineer (But what do I know? I'm just a backwoods engineer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

Yelp is a real racket. Anyone can post defamatory reviews of businesses. If the business wants the post removed - they need to pay to join Yelp.


9 posted on 12/02/2020 11:00:32 AM PST by CTyank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
Twitter is awfu close to a deliberately-mismanaged utility.

An unequal ability to broadcast a short, concise message to break news. The equivalent of an AP wire in everyone's hands. Whatever follows Twitter will be simply more diffuse receptors in the internet of things. Twitter is the democratization of democratized communications, but unfortunately its CEO is a micro-dosing, starvation-nation Lunatic, who decided under Trump that Democratization started with a capital "D". That alone is enough to subject him to Section 230, and by that I mean, punish him until another entity can buy Twitter on the cheap, but not FB or Alphabet/Google.

11 posted on 12/02/2020 11:04:19 AM PST by StAnDeliver (Eric Coomer of Dominion Voting Systems Is The Blue Dress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

no.

it’s not the dawn of the internet santorum. social media has its “big boy,” monopoly pants on now. it obviously can take care of itself. disallowing individual law suits is always a bad idea, imo. if you’re business today and you can’t survive a few frivolous lawsuits, then you can’t survive period. your business model is wrong. clean it up. hire some monitors, etc.

and anyway even if..., i’d much rather have no mass social media than have monopoly twitter, you(boob)tube, alphabet, comcast/nbc, facebook, etc.


12 posted on 12/02/2020 11:08:36 AM PST by dadfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

We don’t need to eliminate Section 230, we need to limit it.

We don’t allow lawsuits against the phone company for the content of the conversations that because the phone company is simply the carrier, it doesn’t control the content.

Ditto for lawsuits against ISPs.

What we need companies like Facebook and Twitter to do is to choose. If they’re simply a carrier, distributing the content of others, they should be immune to lawsuits for the content.

But if they’re going to censor the content, they are no longer content-neutral carriers, and they should lose the protections that we provide for carriers.


13 posted on 12/02/2020 11:22:50 AM PST by jdege
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

For the simple fact that there NEEDS to be a “conservative” version of anything proves Section 230 needs to go away.


14 posted on 12/02/2020 11:24:49 AM PST by Retrofitted
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
I have stated it before…… These social media platforms; Face Book, Twitter, Google, are trying to become the only stage of speaking that we will have and because their beliefs in the Socialist NWO do not support our rights to express our opinions they feel they have the right to control and hamper our freedom of speech.

I posted this recently on Facebook and am now in 30 days of FB jail again. Quote "“Planned voter fraud is treason against America and against the president of the United States. And people who are involved in it when the truth comes out should be executed in public squares!!”"
It was my opinion!

They have proven their ideals in hearings in our government...that they are liars and controllers!

17 posted on 12/02/2020 11:36:29 AM PST by high info voter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

I was a Santorum supporter until he declared George Zimmerman guilty of murdering the mugger who attacked him. Zimmerman was later found not guilty on all charges.


18 posted on 12/02/2020 11:46:07 AM PST by Fiji Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

We do not need any laws.

Everybody just needs to cancel their Facebook, Twitter, and Google accounts.

I did it, I am on mewe and Parler now.


19 posted on 12/02/2020 11:50:20 AM PST by DEPcom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

National Review is dead to me.


21 posted on 12/02/2020 12:11:43 PM PST by Demian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

Hey Santorum,

Just tell your friends at Big Tech to start acting like Americans and let political speech be free. That’s all they have to do. Yet, instead, they want to be the hand maidens to the ultra left Democrat socialism, and will censor and destroy any conservative voice in America that goes against it.

They must realize they are a highway, like an interstate, a public thoroughfare, like private malls are viewed in NJ. People can picket at malls in NJ as the state supreme court has granted them access, saying the right of free speech is absolutely available on private mall property, because of the public access!


24 posted on 12/02/2020 1:25:33 PM PST by Titus-Maximus (The trouble with socialism is that you soon run out of other people's zoo animals to eat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

Someone have a link to Section 230? It would be nice to read it, instead of reading about it.


25 posted on 12/02/2020 1:31:49 PM PST by aimhigh (THIS is His commandment . . . . 1 John 3:23)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

Facebook and Twitter engaged in sedition and treason.

Start up an American-style Nuremberg tribunal and hang them.


28 posted on 12/02/2020 3:55:19 PM PST by sergeantdave (Teach a man to fish and he'll steal your gear and sell it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson