“All it takes one State to declare Fraud then the rest will follow.”
I don’t think there has to be a declaration of fraud. I feel the preponderance of the evidence will prove the overwhelming possibility of fraud and will constitute a hold on the election and create the need for an investigation at the least. Don’t need to try for anyone’s throat yet. Need to just fix the problem before you find within the fixing how and who got it that way. It’s all going to be in the discovery, not the sentencing.
wy69
I believe people have been sent to prison just on overwhelming motive and opportunity evidence - even without a body or murder weapon. If you take out a multimillion dollar life insurance policy on your husband, who your friends will testify you wanted to divorce, and then, three days later, he dies in a horrible one car crash, there is motive and opportunity. When he is your fourth dead husband to die in a weird way a few days after you buy the policy, you’ll probably not get away with it. I see each of these states as another “husband”.
“You can’t prove it” or, “show me the body”, is not always a valid defense.