First line of the article does not support the headline.
“the Justice Department has not uncovered evidence” is a long ways from saying that there is “No evidence of fraud”.
Good point, but let’s be blunt and honest. Barr is MIA just as Trump said he was. Yes, the article played the Gateway Pundit clickbait game with the headline, but even his actual quote does not really inspire confidence.
IF Barr was moving forward he would have said “we are concerned about the anomalies and we are trying to explore those to insure the integrity of the election” or something to that effect.
For a guy who argumentatively and forcefully told a CNN anchor that mass mail-in ballots would be very vulnerable to fraud he seems pretty quiet the past few weeks.
“the Justice Department has not uncovered evidence”
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
just everyone else has uncovered it
““the Justice Department has not uncovered evidence””
Some detail on their efforts to uncover would be helpful.
The claim is that regardless of whether there were stolen votes, that there weren’t ENOUGH stolen votes to change the outcome of the election.
I guess we only prosecute bankrobbers when they are successful.
“the Justice Department has not uncovered evidence”....
_______________
Obama: “Change has come”
......FBI now means Falsifying Blind Investigators working under the authority of Distortion of Justice for the permanent dissolution of the sovereignty of the United States & its’ Constitution.
I think the main thrust of the Trump Team is to show how legal voters voting legally could not necessarily enjoy their rights to “equal protection” under the law, nationwide, statewide, countywide, citywide and precinct-to-precinct, not to mention residence-to-residence and post office-to-post office. If it’s not THE main thrust, it’s one of them.