You mean, like with a cloth?
Ha!
“You mean, like with a cloth?”
Only this one is not being allowed to clean up the dirt. If they clear the count, there will be no way to determine whose votes were changed, when, and by who or if it was a change done by the programming of the machine which would have had to be done intentionally, thus criminally. I’m a firm believer that if the machines are erased, it is an intentional effort to hide a crime and is thus a criminal act in itself. This ought to be done nation wide. They need to go to the supreme court to get a hold on the count machine erasing until after a hand recount is done and compared. Then the abuser of the vote can be held criminally for violating amendments under the Constitution of the voters. This is a federal offence covered under the Constitution and the SC can rule on it. Do not destroy evidence. First amendment, fourteenth amendment, fifteenth amendment, twenty-fourth amendment, and possibly the twenty-sixth and twenty-ninth amendment depending on who is voting.
wy69