In Trump’s and Powell’s lawsuits, there are roughly three types of evidence:
1. Eyewitness evidence that
(1) people voted illegally;
(2) ballots were counted in secret;
(3) ballots were forged, backdated, altered, or repeatedly run through counting machines;
(4) there was no signature verification or the machines were altered to fail; and
(5) campaign-watchers were blocked.
2. Expert witness data analysis showing that the pattern of votes (when and how mail-in ballots arrived, the number of votes relative to registered voters, etc.) are so anomalous that they could not happen naturally but had to have been altered by the fraud described in item 1, above, or by computer data manipulation.
3. Expert witness information about problems with voting machines (their origin, manufacture, vulnerabilities, etc.).
The extra wrinkle in this case is incontestable evidence that paper trails and electronic trails were deliberately destroyed.
To date, some courts (as, for example, this Obama judge) have said Trump has no evidence. In fact, Trump has massive evidence for all three categories — and certainly enough to get the election fraud claims over the net onto Biden’s side.
The real question is about Biden’s return volley. He must prove either that the eyewitnesses, the mathematical experts, and the equipment experts lied or are mistaken, or he must provide a compelling counter-narrative to explain how he got more votes than Obama did in 2008
There is also the evidence presented that show the Pennsylvania mail-in ballots were unconstitutional.