Is it a question of throwing out millions of votes after the fact or it a question oa allowing millions of illegal votes to nullify legal votes. Someone will be disenfranchised either way, so should the judge make a ruling based on law or emotion?
“Is it a question of throwing out millions of votes after the fact or it a question oa allowing millions of illegal votes to nullify legal votes. Someone will be disenfranchised either way, so should the judge make a ruling based on law or emotion?“
Seeing the Antifa/BLM commit murder, arson, and assault without repercussions leading into the election, I’m not entirely convinced we’re a nation of laws anymore. Not to mention Hillary’s classified home server and the yearly election fraud that goes unpunished.