The burden of proof should favor Trump in election fraud litigation

American Thinker ^ | 11/28/2020 | Andrea Widburg

[fortes fortuna juvat]

You don’t expect a judge to throw out millions of mail-in ballots after the fact...
............................................
Why not? The act of using them must precede adjudicating whether doing so was unconstitutional. If they were not used there would be no need to determine the question of their constitutionality! Courts don’t spend time and money on hypothetical legal questions.

[MtnClimber]

What about this? Similar to bragging about getting the Ukraine prosecutor fired: Joe Biden brags about having “the most extensive and inclusive VOTER FRAUD organization” in history.

[Auslander154]

Of course I do realize that.
I was just talking in the hypothetical.

But I read that Trump asked the same thing.
Obviously as frustrated as I was in the disgusting unfairness of it all.

[AFB-XYZ]

Obviously as frustrated as I was in the disgusting unfairness of it all.

That's the money quote. :-)

I don't think you'll find a real American anywhere who disagrees with your sentiment.