Posted on 11/28/2020 4:49:32 AM PST by Kaslin
Aficionados of the CBS sitcom The Big Bang Theory may recall an episode from early in the series in which one of the main characters, Leonard, struggles in his effort to assess his budding romance with another primary character, Penny. Leonard eventually decides to use the famous thought experiment of Austrian-Irish physicist Erwin Schrödinger -- commonly known as “Schrödinger’s Cat” -- to explain the paradox created when particles interact and the “wave function” created by the interaction has not yet collapsed into reality. According to Schrodinger, the cat could be both alive and dead at while the experiment was being conducted, its actual state not revealed until the experiment was concluded.
Much debate has occurred to explain this paradox, one of which holds that the multiple truths involved could lead to alternate realities, a “multiverse” in which every possible outcome actually comes to pass, which naturally challenges the very idea of “reality.”
The Left in America seems to be progressively drifting off into their own version of reality; riots are peaceful, counting legal ballots is a threat to our democracy, and vicious attacks on political opponents are meant to “heal” a divided nation. But should we simply dismiss the Left’s tendency to invert reality as either idiocy or deceit, or perhaps instead consider the prospect that they’ve been researching the existence of parallel dimensions? Let’s examine some specific examples.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
Very interesting theory
Its a cult
The author gives the left way too much credit.
Random NPC leftist: “Schroeder’s cat? I thought Snoopy sat on his piano...”
That needs to be a bumper sticker, t-shirt, coffee mug ...
Schroedinger’s cat is dead, then.
Sounds like our author’s been (re)reading R. Anton Wilson’s Schrodinger’s Cat series.
The entire premise of the trilogy is (amidst in-jokes and conspiracy stuff) that reality jumps are effected by radical defiance of social norms.
See also “chaos magick.”
Also correlates with every Marxist takeover plan:
1. F everything up until order is destroyed;
2. Come in ‘by any means necessary’ (more ruthless than anyone else out there) and assert central control; and
3. Kill, in order, your powerful foes, then the group that violently gave you power (what if they turned?), and anyone bright/influential enough to incite pushback. (Repeat until out of people and/or resources).
That has been the Democrat Party’s political strategy since the sixties.
The defiance and scrapping of social taboos and moral absolutes has been the Leftist battle plan for the conversion of the Unite States to a Communist utopia from the early Twentieth Century.
A statement is either true or false. There is no middle ground between true and false. “The cat is alive” is either true or false. “The cat is dead” is either true or false.
One’s inability to know does not mean that this principle is invalid.
I believe it’s actually much simpler, put forward by Orwell in 1984.
Control the language and eventually you will control the thoughts of the people. Then the people will all agree on how many fingers are being held up, or will otherwise die a horrible death.
Mark
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.