I’m a little confused, & would be grateful for clarification. How to reconcile the hopeful news in the above article with the appellate court tossing the PA lawsuit recently?
I know the appellate dismissal puts the PA matter on a fast track to the Supremes, but the above-referenced judge stopping certification makes it sound like the PA case is still alive.
Thanks in advance. So many cases going simultaneously in multiple states that it’s impossible to keep everything straight.
It’s good news to be rejected quickly by a stooge dem court.
Much better than them delaying, when days count.
The entire goal is to get it to SCOTUS asap.
Two separate topics; one was fraud and the other was PA constitution. The latter was the one that didn’t get past the appellate court.
“””I know the appellate dismissal puts the PA matter on a fast track to the Supremes, but the above-referenced judge stopping certification makes it sound like the PA case is still alive.”””
The Trump Team argued in their Nov 9 complaint that the PA Secretary of State violated Act 77 in the guidelines given regarding absentee ballots. The 3rd circuit said: “So what. The SOS and election officials have lots of latitude.”
Now the Injunction Judge is saying that Act 77 violates the PA Constitution.
Thus, the 2020 election in PA becomes invalid and remedies need to be done.
This might help keep it straight. Cases filed, info about them, where they are in the system, kept updated.
https://www.scotusblog.com/election-litigation/