Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pennsylvania House of Representatives November 27,2020 Memorandum: A Resolution Declaring the results of statewide electoral contests in the 2020 General Election to be in dispute
Pennsylvania House of Representatives ^ | 11/27/2020 | Pennsylvania House Co-Sponsorship Memoranda

Posted on 11/27/2020 6:49:06 PM PST by SeekAndFind

MEMORANDUM

Posted: November 27, 2020 12:50 PM

From: Representative Russ Diamond and Rep. Eric R. Nelson, Rep. Paul Schemel, Rep. Greg Rothman, Rep. Francis X. Ryan, Rep. Dawn W. Keefer, Rep. Mike Jones, Rep. David H. Rowe, Rep. Michael J. Puskaric, Rep. Barbara Gleim, Rep. Bud Cook, Rep. Cris Dush, Rep. Stephanie Borowicz, Rep. David H. Zimmerman, Rep. Daryl D. Metcalfe, Rep. David M. Maloney, Sr., Rep. Dan Moul, Rep. Brad Roae, Rep. Kathy L. Rapp, Rep. Jim Cox, Rep. Rob W. Kauffman

To: All House members

Subject: RESOLUTION Disputing the 2020 General Election Statewide Contest Results

In the immediate future, we will be introducing the following resolution:

**********

A RESOLUTION

Declaring the results of statewide electoral contests in the 2020 General Election to be in dispute.

WHEREAS, Article I, Section 4, Clause 1 of the United States Constitution empowers state legislatures, including the General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, to prescribe the “Times, Places, and Manner” of conducting elections; and

WHEREAS, Article II, Section 1, Clause 2 of the United States Constitution empowers state legislatures, including the General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, to direct the manner of appointing electors for President and Vice President of the United States; and

WHEREAS, the General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania has exercised its authority to establish election administration procedures for the Commonwealth, known as the Pennsylvania Election Code; and

WHEREAS, the Pennsylvania Election Code requires all mail-in ballots to be received by eight o’clock P.M. on the day of the election; and

WHEREAS, the Pennsylvania Election Code requires election officials at polling places to authenticate the signatures of in-person voters; and

WHEREAS, the Pennsylvania Election Code requires that county boards of elections shall not meet to conduct a pre-canvass of all absentee and mail-in ballots until seven o’clock A.M. on Election Day, during which time defects on mail-in ballots would be identified; and

WHEREAS, the Pennsylvania Election Code prohibits the counting of defective absentee or mail-in ballots; and

WHEREAS, the Pennsylvania Election Code authorizes “watchers,” selected by candidates and political parties, to observe the process of canvassing absentee and mail-in ballots; and

WHEREAS, the Commonwealth conducted an election on November 3, 2020 for federal offices, including selecting electors for President and Vice President of the United States; and

WHEREAS, officials in the Executive and Judicial Branches of the Commonwealth infringed upon the General Assembly’s authority under the United States Constitution by unlawfully changing the rules governing the November 3, 2020 election in the Commonwealth; and

WHEREAS, on September 17, 2020, less than seven weeks before the November 3, 2020 election, the partisan majority on the Supreme Court of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania unlawfully and unilaterally extended the deadline for mail-in ballots to be received, mandated that ballots mailed without a postmark would be presumed to be received timely, and could be accepted without a verified voter signature; and

WHEREAS, on October 23, 2020, less than two weeks before the November 3, 2020 election and upon a petition from the Secretary of the Commonwealth, the Supreme Court of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania ruled that mail-in ballots need not authenticate signatures for mail-in ballots, thereby treating in-person and mail-in voters dissimilarly and eliminating a critical safeguard against potential election crime; and

WHEREAS, on November 2, 2020, the night before the November 3, 2020 election and prior to the prescribed time for pre-canvassing mail-in ballots, the office of the Secretary of the Commonwealth encouraged certain counties to notify party and candidate representatives of mail-in voters whose ballots contained defects; and

WHEREAS, heavily Democrat counties permitted mail-in voters to cure ballot defects while heavily Republican counties followed the law and invalidated defective ballots; and

WHEREAS, in certain counties in the Commonwealth, watchers were not allowed to meaningfully observe the pre-canvassing and canvassing activities relating to absentee and mail-in ballots; and

WHEREAS, in other parts of the Commonwealth, watchers observed irregularities concerning the pre-canvassing and canvassing of absentee and mail-in ballots; and

WHEREAS, postal employees in Pennsylvania have reported anomalies relating to mail-in ballots, including multiple ballots delivered to a single address with unfamiliar addressees, ballots mailed to vacant homes, empty lots, and addresses that did not exist; and

WHEREAS, witnesses testifying before the Pennsylvania Senate Majority Policy Committee on November 25, 2020 have provided additional compelling information regarding the questionable nature of the administration of the 2020 General Election; and

WHEREAS, there remains ongoing litigation concerning the administration of the November 3, 2020 election in the Commonwealth; and

WHEREAS, in 2016, Pennsylvania’s general election results were certified on December 12, 2016, and on November 24, 2020, the Secretary of the Commonwealth unilaterally and prematurely certified results of the November 3, 2020 election regarding presidential electors despite ongoing litigation; and

WHEREAS, the Pennsylvania House of Representatives has the duty to ensure that no citizen of this Commonwealth is disenfranchised, to insist that all elections are conducted according to the law, and to satisfy the general public that every legal vote is counted accurately;

THEREFORE, be it RESOLVED that the Pennsylvania House of Representatives—

1. Recognizes substantial irregularities and improprieties associated with mail-in balloting, pre-canvassing, and canvassing during the November 3, 2020 election; and

2. Disapproves of the infringement on the General Assembly’s authority pursuant to the United States Constitution to regulate elections; and

3. Disapproves of and disagrees with the Secretary of the Commonwealth’s premature certification of the results of the November 3, 2020 election regarding presidential electors; and

4. Declares that the selection of presidential electors and other statewide electoral contest results in this Commonwealth is in dispute; and

5. Urges the Secretary of the Commonwealth and the Governor to withdraw or vacate the certification of presidential electors and to delay certification of results in other statewide electoral contests voted on at the 2020 General Election; and

6. Urges the United States Congress to declare the selection of presidential electors in this Commonwealth to be in dispute.

**********

Please join us in cosponsoring this critical resolution.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: 2020; elections; pennsylvania; resolution
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 next last
To: Abbeville Conservative

BS. There was no confusion.


21 posted on 11/27/2020 7:09:15 PM PST by mazz44 (http://knowledgeofhealth.com/why-animals-age-they-produce-less-vitamin-c-same-for-humans/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: tflabo

RE: I dont see Col. Doug Mastrioni’s name on there. Is he a state Senator?

Yes, he is a State Senator for for Pennsylvania’s 33rd District


22 posted on 11/27/2020 7:12:24 PM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: mazz44

I guess everyone on Bannon’s War Room that has been talking about these numbers and the mistake Rudy made are full of crap. No, it was a mistake and Rudy has acknowledged it.


23 posted on 11/27/2020 7:12:41 PM PST by Abbeville Conservative (Preventing the theft of the 2020 Presidential Election is that hill we've talked about)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: kvanbrunt2

“It is impossible for more mail-in ballots to come in than were sent out unless there was a massive and undeniable voter fraud scheme in play.”

Would people please catch up! This has been debunked. There are plenty of articles before the election stating 2.5 million were sent out. How can our side keep making this simple unforced errors. Does not inspire much confidence.


24 posted on 11/27/2020 7:13:54 PM PST by sunny bonobo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: mazz44

The article I quoted said that far more ballot were mailed out then returned. The argument the poster I was responding to was making was that far more mail in ballot were returned then were sent out.


25 posted on 11/27/2020 7:13:57 PM PST by Armscor38
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Abbeville Conservative

Rudy and his team got that number of the official website. And as soon as it made the hearing the crooked operator of that website and political hack took it down but it’s too late the data’s out there furthermore the out of territory fake ballots that were printed and inserted… wait for it… the people who did it have already turned evidence over... But that portion will be given to the Supreme Court in private testimony to spare the lives of the whistle blowers. Wait for it.


26 posted on 11/27/2020 7:22:06 PM PST by MIA_eccl1212 (When the bad guys have leverage they use it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: MIA_eccl1212

I’ve seen multiple articles posted on here prior to the election that shows PA saying 2.5 million ballots were sent out. Also, Rudy has apparently admitted that he mixed up the two numbers. What is not in dispute is the 570,000 biden votes to 3,700 Trump vote dump that came in. That is the most blatant evidence of something fraudulent taking place.


27 posted on 11/27/2020 7:27:49 PM PST by Abbeville Conservative (Preventing the theft of the 2020 Presidential Election is that hill we've talked about)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: entropy12

Thanks for your matter of facts post.

It’s just so frustrating to keep waiting for the proverbial dam to break with irrefutable evidence to compel expedited action.

Moreover, with all of this time elapsing, the evidentiary trail has grown cold.

This is just another blatant example of the RATS committing crimes and covering up their tracks.

We had Crooked Hillary bleach-bitting her servers, etc., and smashing her phone(s) with hammers.

Then, somewhere close to 30 members of Mueller’s team deleting their phone records.

Will continue to pray that justice is done and President Trump’s rightful reelection is ultimately established by courageous state legislatures or swift court intervention.

But precious little time remains , , ,


28 posted on 11/27/2020 7:31:48 PM PST by edie1960
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Abbeville Conservative

“One important item is missing. I see no reference to the legislature being the body to now select the electors. “

Second one.

WHEREAS, Article II, Section 1, Clause 2 of the United States Constitution empowers state legislatures, including the General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, to direct the manner of appointing electors for President and Vice President of the United States; and


29 posted on 11/27/2020 7:31:58 PM PST by TexasGator (Z1z)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: crz

They HAVE TO DO this by resolution OR the governor can veto they can do this with a resolution according to their state constitution!!!


30 posted on 11/27/2020 7:34:21 PM PST by Trump Girl Kit Cat (Yosemite Sam raising hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator
So then why ask for #6 at the end?

6. Urges the United States Congress to declare the selection of presidential electors in this Commonwealth to be in dispute.

31 posted on 11/27/2020 7:39:56 PM PST by Abbeville Conservative (Preventing the theft of the 2020 Presidential Election is that hill we've talked about)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum; crusty old prospector

This is a boom...

Article II of the Constitution is clear. State Legislatures run these elections and ultimately select the electors.

The PA Legislature appears set to effectively invalidate the ‘results’ from Nov. 3 because of actions that violate PA State law and send their own slate of electors.

They have the authority... not the Gov., not the PA Supreme Court. It’s their call if they choose to make it.


32 posted on 11/27/2020 7:43:39 PM PST by rwilson99 (How exactly would John 3:16 not apply to Mary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Abbeville Conservative

The PA Senate version addresses your concern.

https://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/Legis/CSM/showMemoPublic.cfm?chamber=S&SPick=20190&cosponId=32629&fbclid=IwAR1lmU1fCwpu66Tjxoeh4IemRsyBmH26mwRK5TdIyMcnNonCwsB31ynEK-s


33 posted on 11/27/2020 7:45:15 PM PST by rwilson99 (How exactly would John 3:16 not apply to Mary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Abbeville Conservative

#6 combined with similar actions in two other states... pushes the final vote to the House.

1 Vote per State Delegation.
GOP leads here 26:24


34 posted on 11/27/2020 7:46:26 PM PST by rwilson99 (How exactly would John 3:16 not apply to Mary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Abbeville Conservative

So if I understand what you’re saying- the mistake ( by Rudy)was counting the number of primary ballots as election day ballots? And then making assumptions based on those numbers?


35 posted on 11/27/2020 7:46:47 PM PST by SE Mom (Screaming Eagle mom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: rwilson99

Perfect! Thanks for sharing.


36 posted on 11/27/2020 7:47:47 PM PST by Abbeville Conservative (Preventing the theft of the 2020 Presidential Election is that hill we've talked about)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: rwilson99

I thought we led 28-22.


37 posted on 11/27/2020 7:48:34 PM PST by Abbeville Conservative (Preventing the theft of the 2020 Presidential Election is that hill we've talked about)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: SE Mom

The confusion was Rudy quoted the number of ballots sent out for the primary as the number sent out for the general election. There were over 700,000 more ballots sent out for the general election.


38 posted on 11/27/2020 7:50:11 PM PST by Abbeville Conservative (Preventing the theft of the 2020 Presidential Election is that hill we've talked about)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: All

> Also, Rudy has apparently admitted that he mixed up the two numbers.

rudy... aarrgghh...

:-/


39 posted on 11/27/2020 7:51:08 PM PST by SteveH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Nextrush

Oh yeah I forgot about Tom Ridge. What an establishment RINO hack.


40 posted on 11/27/2020 7:51:12 PM PST by Blue Highway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson