Not to be disrespectful but, yes, you are wrong. The Supreme Court does not hear or take evidence, it only reviews whether the lower court erred in some manner. And the only issue before the Court is whether the trial court erred in denying Rudy’s request to amend his complaint a second time.
>>Not to be disrespectful but, yes, you are wrong. The Supreme Court does not hear or take evidence,<<
That doesn’t really make sense. How would the Supreme Court adjudicate a case without hearing the arguments of both sides as to the legitimacy of their case?
They would almost certainly take oral arguments.