To: E. Pluribus Unum
“Election officials across the country have found no evidence of widespread fraud, as Trump has alleged.”
So now it’s WIDESPREAD fraud.
16 posted on
11/27/2020 9:17:04 AM PST by
BobL
(I shop at Walmart and eat at McDonald's, I just don't tell anyone, like most here.)
To: BobL
And it’s still “(e)lection officials”, as if they were the sole arbiter. Good old “argumentum ad verecundiam”.
20 posted on
11/27/2020 9:18:26 AM PST by
Olog-hai
("No Republican, no matter how liberal, is going to woo a Democratic vote." -- Ronald Reagan, 1960)
To: BobL
Hillary had 65 million votes—allegedly Super Joe got 80 million votes—that fraud sounds kinda “widespread” to me... :-)
31 posted on
11/27/2020 9:24:26 AM PST by
cgbg
( Remember 1876--we _can_ do this!--Biden--Office of the Prisoner-Elect)
To: BobL
So now it’s WIDESPREAD fraud.It would take only 100,000 votes in both PA and MI, and much less than that in GA, WI, or AZ. Would that be deemed "not widespread?"
To: BobL; E. Pluribus Unum
“Election officials across the country have found no evidence of widespread fraud, as Trump has alleged.”They only cheated where they had to.
104 posted on
11/27/2020 11:01:14 AM PST by
fso301
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson