Posted on 11/26/2020 12:19:56 PM PST by Kaslin
Four hundred years ago, the religious dissidents we know as the Pilgrims began arriving in New England. Just as The New York Times has decided to engage in revisionist history of our nation's founding with its "1619 Project," this past week, USA Today tried the same with Thanksgiving.
In all the revisionist readings of American history, what the progressive reeducators of our history downplay is that great marvel carried into the New World in New England after the brutal winter of 1620 into 1621.
William Bradford, the second governor of the Plymouth Colony, wrote his history of the period called "Of Plymouth Plantation." Bradford claimed the Pilgrims intended to share "the gospel of the kingdom of Christ" with the people who resided in America.
The Pilgrims came intent on establishing their new colony like the early church. Acts 2:44-45 note of the early church, "And all those who had believed were together and had all things in common; and they began selling their property and possessions and were sharing them with all, as anyone might have need." The Pilgrims, based on the demands of investors back in England, organized themselves along the same lines. The key difference was the early church did it voluntarily, and the Pilgrims would use their colonial government to enforce it. Property, housing, cattle and everything else would be communally shared.
Arriving in November of 1620 with 102 people aboard the Mayflower, half the ship's population was dead within months. By 1623, in desperate straits, Bradford determined their communal living arrangements were failing them. The Pilgrims were learning that some worked harder than others, and all of them knew everything would be divided equally.
Bradford documented the decision to abandon communal living in favor of private property. He wrote: "At length, after much debate of things, the Governor (with the advice of the chiefest amongst them) gave way that they should set corn every man for his own particular, and in that regard trust to themselves; in all other things to go on in the general way as before. And so assigned to every family a parcel of land, according to the proportion of their number."
The establishment of private property for each family to tend for themselves provided incentive for not just self-improvement but for community flourishing. Those with excess could trade with those whose labor was not as successful. Eventually, even the housing and farm animals in the colony were divided up and pulled out of the "common good," as Bradford described their communal arrangement.
By providing each family land and corn, from which that family could then grow their food, harvest and replant from their harvest, the Plymouth Colony grew and prospered. The experiment by that religious colony after their first Thanksgiving helped pave the way for what is commonly called the "Puritan work ethic." Through one's own hard work and initiative, a person could make a living for himself.
Now, here in the 21st-century, some seem to have forgotten that lesson, and others are intent on writing it out of the history books. Socialism is all the rage with some, and even more have decided the government should pick winners and losers in our society. The survival of the Pilgrims should teach us better lessons.
Private property, commerce and free enterprise are good things. The further a country moves away from them, the worse those countries perform. Even China, while trying to preserve communism, is allowing its citizens to embrace free enterprise, though not private property. Our private property system gives us advantages, including an entrepreneurial spirit.
Unfortunately, on a bipartisan basis in Washington, our regulators and legislators are increasingly propping up systems that are not fair or level. David cannot slay Goliath, because the tax code and regulatory structure favor and subsidize Goliath while driving up competitive costs for David. We should be thankful for the many blessings we have in this country, and we should, as a matter of policy, remember the Pilgrims and recommit to the ideals of hard work and private ownership to allow all Americans access to the American dream.
So we've been told.
That puritan work ethic lives on in the riots and looting..Look how hard they all work....
It wouldn’t be so bad ,but you have to get up before noon....
"The Protestant work ethic, the Calvinist work ethic,[1] or the Puritan work ethic[2] is a work ethic concept in theology, sociology, economics and history which emphasizes that hard work, discipline, and frugality[3] are a result of a person's subscription to the values espoused by the Protestant faith, particularly Calvinism."
They were an independent autonomous assembly of Bible-believers intending to practice the religion of the first followers of Jesus. The Puritans were a separate colony and came later.
The Pilgrims tried the communistic approach to government and found immediately that it does not work, even with Christians trying to practice it. They found that only basic capitalism which rewards personal productivity is the only temporal economy that supports life and health, botth physical and spiritual.
The Pilgrims were a mixed lot. only about half of whom were of the original Scrooby group. The remainder were simply artisans looking for a new life in the New World. They were not "religionists" per se.
But none of them were of the Puritan sect of an agreed-upon variety of Calvinistic theological convincement.
Actually, the people who really motivated the American work ethic were not the Calvinistic Puritans. What really caused a great and continuous productivity was the selfless "holiness" movement, principally the Arminian Methodists, whose author John Wesley proclaimed the basic Protestant economy by putting the principle for hard workers in his words:
Nothing better has yet been invented as a life guide for personal, denominational, or national wealth management.
Noon? I get up at 5am every work day. And I know a few people who get up before 5am.
That’s white people’s time ... Do people on welfare even know there is a 5 a.m. ????
Sure. That’s usually when they go to bed.
Like the above, Rush first provided this rendition of that history saying the Pilgrims showed socialism is a failure. However, this rendition leaves out some important facts; including their own interpretation of the events.
Their first crops, communal effort, produced plentiful results. But with arrival of a new group of pilgrims on the recent resupply shipment their bountiful crops turn into marginal crops. And yes, they did notice that some folks did not appear to be as hard working as others.
When they did have individual fields, at first the crops were fast growing but then the rains disappeared and the crops dried and died. They themselves admitted that they were being punished by God for being selfish. After the crops were brown and black they repented to God of their selfishness and gentle rains came and brought back to life the dead crops and produced HUGE (Trumpism) supply.
This is their recount and interpretation. I am not for socialism but we should use their interpretation not our bias interpretation to prove our point.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.