Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Religion and Politics
The point is that the counting of the ballots by hand was to "audit" what the machine system reported.

I'm sorry Sir, but recounts of any type, and audits, are not synonymous. These are distinct technical terms.

The vote totals were for the most part confirmed.

Of the ballots they supposedly have, many of which have questionable origin, that an actual "audit" such as the requested signature matching process would likely disqualify.

when the lawsuit claims foreign secret software manipulation of the vote counts after the potential of that happening already having been proven negative in Georgia, then it seems like grasping at straws.

There's well established evidence these electronic voting companies have foreign ties, including foreign servers of their own that are involved in vote tabulation. Dominion has its headquarters in foreign country, for example. You really think that is acceptable, and beyond reproach?

I am now more sympathetic to Kemp and Raffensburger

So you still support Raffensburger, even knowing he made a secret under the table agreement with Democrats, to try to conduct the election in a manner that violated GA state law. Interesting.

429 posted on 11/26/2020 10:53:00 AM PST by Golden Eagle (List of Cable News Alternatives ----> http://freerepublic.com/~goldeneagle/ <---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 423 | View Replies ]


To: Golden Eagle
I'm sorry Sir, but recounts of any type, and audits, are not synonymous. These are distinct technical terms.

Golden Eagle, how do you suggest to audit the machine count without hand counting the ballots? The risk limiting audit was carried out by hand counting the entire universe of paper ballots. The two "counts" were compared and the Dominion voting system passed the requirements to be considered validated in the state of Georgia.

Note that after the audit and Georgia certified the election, the Trump campaign then requested a recount. That is a different matter than the risk limited audit of the voting system. Nevertheless, the totals of ballots and who they were cast for was produced by the hand counting of the paper ballots and they were compared to the machine counts produced by the Dominion system.

Please also note that my posts deal with allegation of machine fraud in Georgia. You asked the following:

There's well established evidence these electronic voting companies have foreign ties, including foreign servers of their own that are involved in vote tabulation. Dominion has its headquarters in foreign country, for example. You really think that is acceptable, and beyond reproach?

In the Georgia 2020 election, none of the above had any impact on the Georgia election. Apparently Georgia's order of the Dominion system allowed us to have confidence in the system by producing paper ballots that could later be compared to the machine counts. That was a wise choice since we were able to demonstrate this confidence.

You also asked this:

So you still support Raffensburger, even knowing he made a secret under the table agreement with Democrats, to try to conduct the election in a manner that violated GA state law. Interesting.

Do you know what was agreed to here? I believe that this is in reference to signature matching on absentee ballot REQUESTS. I'm not extremely happy about it, but I think it was better than sending ballots to everyone.

I have been a Kemp supporter and I still am. I never had any opinion or really otherwise supported Raffensburger before the election. However I do think that his claim of being thrown under the bus is true.

439 posted on 11/26/2020 11:26:09 AM PST by Religion and Politics (I'M MAD AS HELL, AND I'M NOT GOING TO TAKE IT ANYMORE!!! PUT ON THE YELLOW VEST!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 429 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson