Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SelfhatingMillennial; LilFarmer; MikeyB806; Lazamataz; Mr. K

Can you read a QR record? No; not likely.

Dominion Voting Systems ImageCast X, where you sit or stand, to mark your votes electronically, prints (via a connected laser printer), a “voter record.”

You see on the printed “voter record” areas (circle/ellipse/oval or such) that are filled according to your votes.

But, the Dominion Voting Systems ImageCast X also prints a QR code on your “voter record.”

You next take your ICX paper “voter record” over to a Dominion tabulator and feed your record into the tabulator.

The Dominion tabulator reads the QR record, NOT what you saw in the “fields” (cirle/ellipse/oval).

In order to *hand count* or *audit* such a “voter record”, the “voter record” must be fed into a scanner, so that the person and persons responsible for handling and observing this “voter record” can verify that:

a) what you saw on your “voter record” - the fields, filled

b) matches with the QR code THAT YOU CANNOT DECIPHER VISUALLY.

Ref. on the matter of how the Dominion ImageCast X works:

In the following setup, a Dominion system:

- creates a QR record that represents the marks made by the voter

- prints out an ICX paper “voter record” that the voter then takes to a Tabulator

The ICX paper “voter record” is NOT a paper ballot, unless the program in the machine is set up to print voter’s choices on an official paper ballot.

Dominion Voting Systems ImageCast X

https://verifiedvoting.org/election-system/dominion-imagecast-x/

ImageCast X Configuration #1 – Ballot Marking Device Only

When configured exclusively as a ballot marking device (which is how most jurisdictions deploy it), ImageCast X does not have scanning or tabulating capabilities. Accordingly, after reviewing choices on the summary page, the voter selects when to print a paper record of their choices. The paper record lists voters’ choice(s) in each contest (rather than all options, like a traditional format ballot), and ImageCast X encodes the voter choices in a non-human readable QR code.

To cast the vote, the voter must insert the paper record into a separate scanning tabulator. The scanner most commonly used with ImageCast X is the ImageCast Precinct.

Dominion tabulators for the ICX paper records always count votes by reading the computerized QR code, NOT the human-readable text that the voter sees.


371 posted on 11/26/2020 9:39:14 AM PST by linMcHlp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 363 | View Replies ]


To: linMcHlp
The ICX paper “voter record” is NOT a paper ballot, unless the program in the machine is set up to print voter’s choices on an official paper ballot.

In Georgia, after voting an official paper ballot was printed showing the voter's choices and the voter checks and verifies that it represents their choices. It is this paper ballot that was hand recounted. The hand recount did not use the QR code. An example would be the video where one auditor called ballots for Biden 3x in one minute or something like that. The auditor looked at the ballot and saw the same selection that the voter saw when they validated it represented their choices.

374 posted on 11/26/2020 9:47:22 AM PST by Religion and Politics (I'M MAD AS HELL, AND I'M NOT GOING TO TAKE IT ANYMORE!!! PUT ON THE YELLOW VEST!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 371 | View Replies ]

To: SelfhatingMillennial; LilFarmer; MikeyB806; Lazamataz; Mr. K

PS. The “hand recount” or “audit” scanner that checks if the QR code and observed marked fields MATCH, can lie to you.

You observe a field filled as a vote for TRUMP.

And, the scanner gives you a GREEN light for “this ‘voter record’ has a MATCH” - QR record and filled fields.

But you do NOT know what the “hand recount” or “audit” scanner actually records for this specific “voter record”.

You only know what some computer says as a summation of what the scanners eventually report to it.

The scanner tells you one thing, and later, sends another thing to the computer-superior collector of tabulation work.

You cannot know the truth, unless scanners - for “hand recount” or “audit” scan ONLY the filled field.

Which brings up another problem:

The built-in deception by Dominion, using a multitude of symbols as possibles for filling a field, where there is but one purpose: filling the field.

Rather than deceptively applying a code to the field.

If there is only ONE SYMBOL for filling fields, then you have a better probability of “scan ONLY the filled field” - providing you a truthful answer.

A summation of “voter records” - of which, ONLY the filled fields are scanned . . . THAT is what you use to compare with Dominion tabulators’ claims asserted during the original election tabulation.


386 posted on 11/26/2020 10:02:32 AM PST by linMcHlp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 371 | View Replies ]

To: SelfhatingMillennial; LilFarmer; MikeyB806; Lazamataz; Mr. K
Adding to my reply 371 at "KRAKEN RELEASED. 104 page GA suit" (11/26/2020 Thursday)

See Sidney Powell's work (documents submitted in Georgia) at:

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/18694655/pearson-v-kemp/

Scroll down to:

"MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order IMMEDIATE HEARING REQUESTED . . ."

Affidavit Declaration of Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai

https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.gand.284055/gov.uscourts.gand.284055.6.1.pdf

Therein, pp. 2-3, paragraph 12:

- - -

12. When votes are tabulated, it is the electronic ballot image that is evaluated by the tabulation software. This makes the electronic ballot image the actual ballot used to count the vote. The paper ballot is merely stored physically by elections officials to serve as the audit trail backup record. Thus, no conclusions about the accuracy of the electronic vote count may be made without access to the actual raw ballot images used to tabulate the vote. Naturally, the electronically tabulated vote count must be identical to the paper ballot hand count in order for election integrity to be established. It is thus mandatory to gain access to the raw ballot images and tabulate a vote count using those very images when the final tally is in dispute.

- - -

568 posted on 11/28/2020 7:44:05 AM PST by linMcHlp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 371 | View Replies ]

To: Lazamataz; Mr. K; SelfhatingMillennial; LilFarmer; MikeyB806; Fractal Trader; dynoman; ...

The KRAKEN may be the evidence *collection*:

At

https://www.sidneypowell.com/

Clicking the Donate button about 1/5 th of the way down the page, takes your Internet browser to:

https://defendingtherepublic.org/

Scroll down to a link:

https://hereistheevidence.com/

There, scroll down to (search for):

“17,327 mail-in ballots were cast in the names of deceased voters in MI”

Over on the right, a “Source” button to click on, takes your Internet browser to:

https://checkyourvote.org/deceased-voters/michigan

Where every DECEASED but VOTED in Michigan, record is listed.

“Every name on this list has voted in the 2020 election . . . and has also been found in one or more obituaries online. All personal information on this list is publicly available and has been obtained legally.”


572 posted on 11/28/2020 10:17:16 AM PST by linMcHlp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 371 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson