Replies

Yes, the vote spikes are a statistical improbability. Notice how many there were, too! I’m betting Coomer or ‘someone’ ran the percentage switching in nearly every state East of the Mississippi and perhaps in the West. Why? Because the seditionists had to create a percentage image to be repeated in the swing states, so it looked normal andin a trend.

Remember Edison data that was being analyzed and all the naysayers saying that it wasn’t election data, but just news feeds? Look at this in one of the exhibits:

13. Each of the tabulation software companies have their own central reporting “affiliate”. Edison Research is the affiliate for Dominion

https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.mied.350905/gov.uscourts.mied.350905.1.15.pdf

Yes, the vote spikes are a statistical improbability. Notice how many there were, too! I’m betting Coomer or ‘someone’ ran the percentage switching in nearly every state East of the Mississippi and perhaps in the West. Why? Because the seditionists had to create a percentage image to be repeated in the swing states, so it looked normal and in a trend.

. . . and, if proven, the conspiracy would constitute an interstate “Racketeering and Corrupt Organization” (best known as RICO).
The interesting question now is, “What if any coverage does “the Kraken” get in “the news?”
Is the FCC in on the RICO?
Journalists claim to defend “the First Amendment” - but what they in fact claim is that journalists who are in good standing with the wire service journalism cartel constitute a kind of unchallengable priestly establishment. Rather than an inchoate bunch of independent scribblers, as the Constitution contemplates.
I wonder what influence this GA court filing will have on the outcome of the upcoming two GA senate contests . . .