To: grobdriver
No, it’s responsible governance.....regardless of who won we must have continuity of government.
The GSA is not an arbiter of elections when the results are muddled like this and the final result is weeks away.
At some point, they have to place their chips on both and let the process sort out.
I applaud the GSA administrator for his/her fortitude up to this point and the cautious approval.
This in no way diminishes President Trump’s case nor his pathway to his second term.
17 posted on
11/24/2020 5:39:28 AM PST by
nevergore
(I have a terrible rash on my covfefe....)
To: nevergore
No, it’s responsible governance.....regardless of who won we must have continuity of government.
This is "normalcy bias" which is _totally_ unacceptable in the current situation.
Ten million votes have been stolen--don't believe me?:
Check out the popular vote for the Democratic candidate for President, 2008, 2012, 2016 and then 2020:
2008: 69.5M–the first black candidate–massive enthusiasm in the black community
2012: 65.9M–the thrill is gone, turnout goes down
2016: 65.8M–black turnout stays low with no black candidate
2020: 79.8M–This incredibly high turnout was because the Democrats offered a young, articulate, visionary candidate who had huge campaign rallies around the country motivating Democrats to vote
(Is there _anyone_ on the planet stupid enough to _believe_ _that_ 2020 narrative? Anyone?)
This magnitude of vote theft is not "government", it is totally fraudulent and must be stopped.
No concessions should be made to the fraudsters.
This was a tactical blunder.
We can overcome it, but there is no point in lying about it.
23 posted on
11/24/2020 9:28:12 AM PST by
cgbg
( Remember 1876--we _can_ do this!--Biden--Office of the Prisoner-Elect)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson