Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nine Reasons Congress Should Nix the Air Force’s F-15EX Purchase
Defense One ^ | August 11, 2020 | John Venable

Posted on 11/23/2020 4:33:23 PM PST by Zhang Fei

Here are nine reasons why Congress should remove the authorization to acquire the F-15EX from the 2021 National Defense Authorization Act.

1. Acquisition cost. In fiscal year 2022, the Air Force will pay $77.9 million for each fully equipped and ready-for-combat F-35A it acquires. Each F-15EX, on the other hand, will cost $87.7 million — but that’s for an airshow capability. If the Air Force wants to fly it in combat, then each jet needs a $12.2 million electronic countermeasures system known as the Eagle Passive Active Warning Survivability system, or EPAWSS, and a $900,000 targeting pod. This brings the cost of a combat-ready F-15EX to $102 million, 30 percent more than an F-35A.

2. Operational capability. The F-15EX airframe was designed 45 years ago. While many of its electronic boxes carry more modern capabilities, most were considered new technology when baby-boomers were still using a dial-up internet service. Its metal skin covering will serve as a homing beacon for modern surface-to-air missiles. To survive merely at the fringes of a peer’s air defenses, the F-15EX requires numerous other fighter and electronic countermeasures jets to protect it. In mock air-to-air combat training, stealth fighters destroy fourth-generation fighters like the F-15EX at a kill ratio that often exceeds 16-to-1. Perhaps those numbers are wild exaggerations; perhaps the F-35 is really equal to, say, just two of those $102 million fighters. Somehow paying $204 million for a capability $77.9 million can buy does not seem like a good deal for America.

3. Operating costs. One of the biggest arguments for the F-15EX is how much cheaper it will be to operate than the F-35, but even that argument is flawed. The price for fuel, oil, and the maintenance personnel it takes to launch, maintain, and repair a fighter are combined into a

(Excerpt) Read more at defenseone.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aerospace; f35; kag; maga; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last
Did the Pentagon order this batch as a lifeline to Boeing, whose commercial side is getting killed by lockdowns, as well as the downturn in business and leisure travel even where lockdowns aren't an issue?
1 posted on 11/23/2020 4:33:23 PM PST by Zhang Fei
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Zhang Fei

The Purpose of the EX is to get foreign export dollars.

We are just buying some to replace old F-15C’s that break in half, so we don’t waste F22 hours intercepting Bear Bombers.


2 posted on 11/23/2020 4:43:27 PM PST by UNGN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UNGN

[We are just buying some to replace old F-15C’s that break in half]


Is this a description of cracks discovered by mechanics on the ground or of actual events in mid-air?


3 posted on 11/23/2020 4:52:11 PM PST by Zhang Fei (My dad had a Delta 88. That was a car. It was like driving your living room.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: UNGN

The F-35 is a nightmare. The F-15 is proven. A bird or a BB brings down an F-35. F-15 a little more robust in the aerodynamic/electro-mechanical dimension, not to mention 2 engines, enough to bring it home after one is gone. F-15 even landed with one wing gone. F-35 just went “a bridge too far” down the McNamara road of hoping to get one weapon do to the job of several others. I think the F-111 ended up being called the Ardvark. I wonder what name the F-35 will end up with? The Matrix? Just too much overly optimistic engineering crammed into a flying machine. Well, that is my impression.


4 posted on 11/23/2020 4:55:58 PM PST by Check6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Zhang Fei

A few years back a Missouri ANG F-15C literally snapped in half while in the air. So while that kind of catastrophic failure is rare, it does suggest that the high-time air frames are done for.


5 posted on 11/23/2020 5:09:39 PM PST by Tallguy (Facts be d@mned! The narrative must be protected at all costs!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Zhang Fei

The power behind Biden will use the Military to control US citizens , Fighter Jets will not be needed


6 posted on 11/23/2020 5:10:50 PM PST by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tallguy

[A few years back a Missouri ANG F-15C literally snapped in half while in the air. So while that kind of catastrophic failure is rare, it does suggest that the high-time air frames are done for.]


Thanks. You’d think ground crew inspections would catch stuff like that.


7 posted on 11/23/2020 5:19:10 PM PST by Zhang Fei (My dad had a Delta 88. That was a car. It was like driving your living room.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Check6

No new aircraft designs were needed after the F-4.


8 posted on 11/23/2020 5:20:19 PM PST by Hugh the Scot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Check6

[The F-35 is a nightmare.]


To fit into post-Cold War budgets, they designed this with one engine. But it’s a pretty good plane. Every major ally bought this with cash money (with the exception of Israel, which has the benefit of $3b in annual grants). They can purchase any other plane in production, including the Gripen, the Eurofighter and the Rafale, but they went for the F-35. That’s not because they’re looking to prop up LockMart.


9 posted on 11/23/2020 5:24:20 PM PST by Zhang Fei (My dad had a Delta 88. That was a car. It was like driving your living room.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Zhang Fei

A lot of that stuff is deeply hidden and it’s depot level maintenance where the non-destructive maintenance takes place, like X-Ray or Magnaflux tests looking for micro-cracks in the wing box and wing spars. That failure over St. Louis was extraordinary.


10 posted on 11/23/2020 5:26:38 PM PST by Tallguy (Facts be d@mned! The narrative must be protected at all costs!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: UNGN

The f35 is able to be sold to foreign countries. At least the a version.


11 posted on 11/23/2020 5:29:39 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not Averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tallguy

[A lot of that stuff is deeply hidden and it’s depot level maintenance where the non-destructive maintenance takes place, like X-Ray or Magnaflux tests looking for micro-cracks in the wing box and wing spars. That failure over St. Louis was extraordinary.]


After looking up the event, I’m amazed the pilot survived.


12 posted on 11/23/2020 5:31:37 PM PST by Zhang Fei (My dad had a Delta 88. That was a car. It was like driving your living room.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Zhang Fei

F-15 carries substantially more weapons payload than the F-35 and plays a differet role so comparing one against the other is unrealistic since they will be working in tandem. F-35 is the unseen quarterback directing F-15’s to targets after stealth wild weasel take out Sams. BTW, the F-15 is still one of the fastest fighters in the world. Yes, metal fatigue of the airframes/wings will be an issue but they will be x-rayed before being refitted. I see this as a stop gap measure until F-35 directed drones become available.


13 posted on 11/23/2020 5:47:58 PM PST by vigilence (Vigilence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vigilence

Concur.


14 posted on 11/23/2020 5:53:30 PM PST by Check6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Zhang Fei
"But it’s (F35) a pretty good plane"


It's a piece of junk...
15 posted on 11/23/2020 6:01:03 PM PST by Bikkuri (Joe Biden: "Abraham Lincoln is the most racist president ever.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Hugh the Scot
No new aircraft designs were needed after the F-4.
16 posted on 11/23/2020 6:14:20 PM PST by TexasGator (Z1z)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Bikkuri
"It's {F35} a piece of junk.."

I've never flown one, but I do provide support for the maintenance effort (Navy and Marine Corps). The pilots (most flew in Iraq and Afghanistan) really like it.

The maintenance effort for F-18 is getting much more difficult because the planes have greatly exceeded their life span and parts are getting extremely difficult to acquire. Additionally, the testing equipment was considered obsolete years ago, so getting parts for that equipment has become its own effort.

Think of it this way, International Harvester trucks were considered bullet proof, but when you spend half your day trying to find a rebuilt starter, maybe you need to move on.

17 posted on 11/23/2020 6:20:41 PM PST by fini
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Tallguy; Chode; SkyDancer; All
YIKES!!!
18 posted on 11/23/2020 6:22:59 PM PST by mabarker1 ((Congress- the opposite of PROGRESS!!! A fraud, a hypocrite, a liar. I'm a member of Congress !!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

The F-35 can be sold to Foreign countries, but we can sell them F-15’s for more and the F-35 production line is pretty maxed out. It would be Hilarious if we sold a stripped down F-15EX’s to Viet Nam to tweak China.

People that want to fight at long range want two engines. It can carry 22 Air to air missiles so only a cheapskate is going to lose a dog fight.

Also, When Trump talked about “Hypersonic missiles” he was talking about missiles like the 1000 mile range stand off AGM-183 that the EX can carry.

China would be way more scared of an F-15 loaded with 6 AGM-183’s than it would be of an F-35 and its stealth. Most of the Websites discussing the AGM-183 seem to be in Chinese.

Our media never took Trump seriously, but China’s does.


19 posted on 11/23/2020 6:26:05 PM PST by UNGN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: UNGN

Fine

Sell the f15s to others

It doesnt mean we should buy them in place of f35s


20 posted on 11/23/2020 6:33:24 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not Averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson