Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: truthkeeper
I just saw the following article on this matter. I'm hoping some of legal people can shed some light the analyses. Way over my head.

They're right that this was sloppy lawyering by Rudy. The trial judge did three separate things: (1) he dismissed the complaint, (2) he denied an injunction against certifying the vote, and (3) he denied Rudy's motion to file a new version of the Complaint. Rudy has asked for, and been granted, an immediate appeal only of issue number 3. That means that, even if he wins, all he gets is to go back to the trial judge and start over with a new complaint.

In other words, even if he wins this expedited appeal, there will still be no injunction against certifying the votes. Without even a pending request for an injunction, there is nothing Rudy can take up to SCOTUS.

17 posted on 11/23/2020 11:26:19 AM PST by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: Lurking Libertarian

Denying an opportunity to file an amended complaint is greatly frowned upon. Rudy will win on that issue. If so, the other issues don’t really matter.


22 posted on 11/23/2020 12:03:38 PM PST by WASCWatch ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson