The evidence isn't just one or two crimes or irregularities; it's mountains of it.
1 posted on
11/22/2020 10:12:36 PM PST by
Boomer
To: Boomer
Tell that to all the reactionary simpiltons on Free Republic these days...
2 posted on
11/22/2020 10:17:22 PM PST by
mazz44
(http://knowledgeofhealth.com/why-animals-age-they-produce-less-vitamin-c-same-for-humans/)
To: Boomer
Can these two statements be proven?
“Trump won the largest non-white vote share for a Republican presidential candidate in 60 years. Biden underperformed Hillary Clinton in every major metro area around the country, save for Milwaukee, Detroit, Atlanta and Philadelphia.”
If so, then there is good reason to doubt the legitimacy of the 2020 Presdiential election.
3 posted on
11/22/2020 10:17:51 PM PST by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire. Or both.)
To: Boomer
LOL. Whenever anyone on twitter insinuates Biden winning do they post a disclaimer?
To: Boomer
Pls explain the colors and numerical gradient used in SIGNIFICANCE and ADMISSIBILITY.
16 posted on
11/22/2020 11:16:06 PM PST by
gasport
(Vote Democrat . . . Win stupid stuff)
To: Boomer
This seems like a really good table. though it needs a legend to explain what things mean. Such as:
"1" less significance.
"Admissibility" means what if it failed in the kangaroo court?
Thanks
21 posted on
11/23/2020 12:46:38 AM PST by
Steve Van Doorn
(*in my best Eric Cartman voice* 'I love you, guys')
To: Boomer
As compelling of a story these data sets may be, that alone will not stand at SCOTUS. It would be viewed as subjective. But we have sworn testimony that validates that presumption. That’s why the MSM is blowing off the thousands of affidavits. That’s where We The People have standing.
25 posted on
11/23/2020 4:04:35 AM PST by
mmanager
(Lets Finish This!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson