[snarkytart]

Listen, I understand this is a strong possibility but we’re moving into Alex Jones territory. We need concrete evidence. You think SCOTUS wants to hear about CIA fixing elections?

[lodi90]

Listen, I understand this is a strong possibility but we’re moving into Alex Jones territory. We need concrete evidence.

---

Hard to find “concrete” evidence when you don’t have police powers to get it. Impossible, basically.

[cgbg]

You think SCOTUS wants to hear about CIA fixing elections?

Nobody _wants_ to hear about that stuff.

Sometimes the truth _hurts_.

But--without it all of our liberties are toast.

[Texas Fossil]

Yes, Virginia, There Could Be Evidence of Vote Fraud

https://www.newsmax.com/murdock/affidavits-bartiromo-tribe-clark/2020/11/20/id/998077/
-
FR Comments: https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3908215/posts

[old curmudgeon]

I am not a lawyer but I have had some experience in courts.

In my experience the bulk of the cases, both prosecution/plaintiff and defense relied on and were decided primarily on witness testimony.

Even when so called solid physical evidence is presented one side testifies that it is the heart of and should decide the case and the other side ridicules its importance.

So there again the court relies on testimony....who is truthful.

“Perry Mason” knocks their socks off happens occasionally but the fact that it is not common is the reason a good lawyer will advise his client that one can never predict what will happen in court.