Tucker is just parroting the DNC liberal talking point which is ‘No Evidence’.
He’s pointed out examples where mundane chicanery has clearly occurred, and mocked the other networks for pretending it doesn’t exist.
In regards Powell’s claims it is more complex: she hasn’t produced evidence - but assuming she had it, she wouldn’t the details of this type of evidence at this stage until she has a chance to declare it in court.
You asserted that she has not produced evidence. That is a bold deception since she has produced affidavits reporting vote fraud witnessed by the affiant, and a signed affidavit IS EVIDENCE which a real court accepts. Did you know that signed witness affidavits are real evidence?
He’s pointed out examples where mundane chicanery has clearly occurred, and mocked the other networks for pretending it doesn’t exist.
In regards Powell’s claims it is more complex: she hasn’t produced evidence - but assuming she had it, she wouldn’t the details of this type of evidence at this stage until she has a chance to declare it in court.
NONSENSE! He may have mocked the OTHER netwoks bur never his own. As far as Sidney Powell, why should she try her case in the press by disclosing all the evidence she has. Tucker cooked his own goose. HE IS NO CONSERVATIVE!