Seeing the graphical display of the vote distributions that were done by Dr. Shiva and his team, I think it cannot be argued that there was no tampering.
When you see the display of Trump votes plotted by precinct in three of four counties in Michigan (where the percentage difference in Trump votes between straight party vote ballots for that precinct and the NON straight party vote percentages for Trump are plotted) you see that as the graph (in three of the top four counties are shown) moves from more leftist precincts to more conservative precincts, the difference showed not only that Trump did worse in more conservative precincts, it showed something more damning:
The downward slope of all the graphs where Trump supposedly did worse is nearly EXACTLY the same for three out of the four largest counties in Michigan.
As one expert said, and I wholly agree, it would be like flipping a coin a thousand times and having it come up heads each time. It just won’t happen. The drop off is too perfect.
I know a little about these things, and when I saw the graph before it was even fully explained, I thought “WTF is that?”
If it comes in front of a court and expert witnesses are called, it will be interesting to see how the Democrats explain that uniformity in the curves. It simply is not natural.
Additionally, they had one county (Wayne County) where it does NOT appear as if an algorithm was run, because that county is heavily Democrat (contains Detroit)
You aren’t going to siphon off Trump votes where the number is going to be small, because if you do...someone WILL notice it. So they went for more heavily conservative areas where skimming the Trump votes and moving them to the Biden column would be less likely to get noticed.
The downward slope is expected, not a horizontal line. In his own words he said that in the 45% straight ticket R precinct, he expects 45% Trump votes from the non-straight ticket voters. Instead there was 25%.
But the other 55% voters are not R voters. That's his claim and his claim is wrong.
Also ridiculously easy to disprove, just hand count one of the lower right precincts. Just 2,000 votes to count at the allegedly affected precinct.