So Boockvar has now filed a response to the restored complaint alleging a deprivation of the equal protection of the law:
“The assertion of a constitutional Equal Protection violation is doomed to fail, she alleged, because the campaign doesnâÂÂt claim that state election officials engaged in discrimination when they allegedly failed to enforce state voting laws uniformly in every county.”
https://www.newsmax.com/politics/gov-law-northam-pol/2020/11/20/id/998103/?oRef=mixi
In short, geographical discrimination is O.K., and it was proper to have different rules in Philadelphia and Pittsburgh, because thier was no discrimination based on race, gender, sexual orientation, or other group based methodology.
I am quite confident that Judge Brann will view the evidence submitted and conclude that PA election violated the equal protection clause of the the Fourtheenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution by having different rules in different places and for different classes of voters. The big issues are enjoining the certification of PA’s election and the drastic remedy of voiding hundreds of thousands of votes, including those cast lawfully that are mixed in with the illegal or fraudulent ballots. Ultimately, that point will go up to SCOTUS. Get some popcorn and enjoy the show this weekend!
Thank you for this information.