Posted on 11/18/2020 6:44:01 AM PST by SeekAndFind
As is their right, a segment of Americans appear to protest the presidential contest by not voting for any candidate while voting down ballot, for example on the Senate race. The number of protest "no votes" appears to be significant enough to impact a close election.
This is a fascinating article, and I am very focused on the Biden-only ballot numbers. Why not have 500,000 or 1,000,000 Biden only ballots to secure an election? I believe that all involved are smart and know that numbers on that scale would create major concerns due to the new vote totals. So, then, how do you try to determine a safe number of Biden-only votes?
You look at the number of ballots with no presidential selection, and you cast a ballot only in the presidential election. This would allow those votes to appear to be part of the normal totals — i.e., it keeps the Senate vote totals in balance with presidential vote totals. Let's take a look at three states in play that had a presidential candidate and a Senate candidate:
State | Biden only | Total Presidential | Protest No-Vote | % Biden only Plus No-Votes |
Arizona | 98,000 | 3,254,513 | 19,897 | 3.62% |
Georgia | 90,000 | 4,916,651 | 15,982 | 2.16% |
Michigan | 115,000 | 5,435,176 | 25,425 | 2.58% |
My initial assumption was that someone took time to "cure" the protest "no-vote" ballots by selecting Biden. With poll-watchers and ballot-handling protocols, that would be a challenge and a good magic trick. Instead, it looks as though they could have created Biden-only ballots.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
OK Folks, If you want to increase votes for your candidate and you don’t want to raise concerns, you have to increase votes for your candidate in a way that does not raise obvious red flags like 500,000 more people voting in the presidential election than voted in the other down-ballot races.
Therefore, someone would have to monitor various data and metrics, including the number of ballots without a presidential selection. That person could then supply totals to the teams that are preparing Biden-only ballots. Those ballots would then be fed into the counting machine as recent arrivals.
Admittedly, this explanation is not proof of fraud. It is merely an explanation of how it could have happened. How could this potential fraud be proven? And how can people dig into this further?
BACKSTORY In a yet unexplained move, key states including PA, Michigan, and WI stopped releasing vote counts on election night.
Fact-checkers have noted that these states didn't stop counting.......but not WHY they stopped releasing the results of their counting.
REALITY CHECK They had to go into the machines and falsify a separate reset to have them come out for Biden.
At 4 a.m. the next morning, huge amounts of fresh Biden votes were being reported. The scam worked, and days later,
the all-knowing, all powerful MSM, themselves, "declared" Biden president-elect.
When things looked bad for Biden, the states inexplicably stopped releasing vote counts.......
is this indicative of an (ahem) transparent Biden administration?
It’s because they had to go in and do a separate reset on the machines to have them come out for Biden.”
Mark Steyn to Powell: “And you have evidence of this? Witnesses to this?”
Sidney Powell: “I do, indeed.”
The simple way to deal with Biden is to have a state arrest him for voter corruption.
Biden offered $7000 bribes to parents and $10000 bribes to student loan borrowers.
Felony voter corruption is easy to prove.
There had to be COORDINATED communication with the algorithm geeks and the fake ballot manufacturers in real time with the number of fakes they needed to overcome Trump's majority.
How did they communicate? By ESP? Remember, Lisa Page and her smirky lover boy Sztrok were so arrogant that they didn't take any precautions whatsoever and sent each other text messages.
Many have asked: WHERE IS BARR? He did sign that DoJ investigation order. Are they looking at communication evidence? Or is Barr just another deep-state tool who refuses to look into the massive fraud that took place...
The simplest way is count sufficient votes twice, ideally enough to block an automatic recount.
A thousand ballots a day (a carton full) for seven days is 7,000 votes, which in many places would mostly be for Biden.
That’s got to burn some chaps.
Ok, I agree with you, BUT....No one has been able to answer this simple question.
You would think, with this widespread fraud, SURELY it had to be well organized and involve a lot of people.
How did these people communicate under the radar?
Why no whistleblowers?
Instead of donating to a Trump defense fund, I SAY OFFER SOME HEAFTY REWARDS TO PEOPLE WHO COME FORTH WITH INFORMATION THAT ULTIMATELY PROVES VOTER FRAUD.
I would be willing to put up $1000 on this forum, with the hope that we can get others to donate, as a reward for anyone who comes forth with proof of voter fraud that can be proven and that will result in Trump receiving a large enough number of votes to win this election.
“Biden offered $7000 bribes to parents and $10000 bribes to student loan borrowers.”
What is this about?
btt
Election theft is like terrorism, there is only common motive and no contemporary communication.
There are too many flavors of voter fraud to settle on any one way; and as this article states, it’s a careful balance when sticking their finger on the scales, lest the tampering is obvious.
Consider too that poll workers can spoil ballots. Take a Trump ballot, and then ‘overvote’ it by selecting *any* other POTUS - even a write-in oval filled in would invalidate that Trump vote.
I don’t think those dumps were actual ballots
Electronic manipulation/rigging makes more sense
h/t HandBasketHell
This was wide-spread fraud.......and rank conspiracy and collusion. There had to be COORDINATED collusion
and multiple communications with power-hungry Democrats, the algorithm geeks, and the fake ballot manufacturers,
conspiring to discuss the number of fakes they needed to overcome Trump's massive majority.
How did they communicate?
AG Barr did sign that DoJ investigation order. Are they looking at communication evidence?
There are two questions that we must be asking:
1) Was there fraud in this election?
2) Was the fraud massive and sufficient to hand the election to Joe Biden?
Here’s the thing — Evidence is CUMULATIVE — The Dead Voting, Statistical improbability, Dominion Software moving votes from Trump to Biden, hundreds of sworn testimonies, newly discovered discarded ballots by the thousands, thousands of votes with ONLY Biden being chosen and no other candidates for congress, senate or local elections, etc. — ALL OF THEM FAVORING BIDEN.
So, in regards to the first question — ABSOLUTELY.
So, In regards to the second question: Was the fraud sufficient to hand the election to Joe Biden?
*THAT* is extremely difficult to prove short of a statewide AUDIT.
The one factor that has the potential to shift votes by the hundreds of thousands from Biden to Trump is the software used to tabulate the votes. Sidney Powell has been on top of this from the get go.... she better deliver because answering the second question very tough.
The evidence presented has to be SOLID ENOUGH to justify state wide audits and recounts ( re-vote even ).
That was my point! Its physically impossible!
AG Barr did sign that DoJ investigation order. Are they looking at communication evidence?
The Barr DOJ isn’t looking at anything but their navels until the electoral college certifies Biden the winner of the stolen election.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.