The sloppiness is indicative of many Hillary controlled events. It appears to have been staffed and synthesized by a small staff, say less than 30-200 personnel. Highly compartmentalized, with some degree of complexity, at a 45% quality development, but never finished, except to dress up the initial design at 45% quality basis of design. Appears to have been rushed to meet timelines to coordinate their attack with others.
Consequently, the errors tend to be obvious with those closer to reality. The defense of their contrived coup is typical propaganda lies, and the adamant defense of lies, never thinking through the consequences of their proposed reporting.
Dr. Shiva points out second order, simple trends, which would never reflect linear relationships, let alone straight line relationships. It’s a BINGO observation in the trends. They are so simple, Intel community AI routines should have picked up on these since 2001.
Had the left manifest a degree of honesty regarding the election counts, similar to Dr Shiva’s comments at the tail end, admitting they were looking for how these trends might be naturally possible,... the omission of this type of perspective on the left, manifests their cognizance of their guilt. Not provable perhaps, but obvious to those who are simply seeking truth.
The sloppiness is because they once again underestimated Trumps margin of victory and had to hurriedly manufacture enough votes to put Biteme over the top.
Thank you for your response. You said it so much better than I did.