Posted on 11/15/2020 6:59:27 PM PST by SeekAndFind
In the Washington beltway world of defense spending and expansion, there's always room to "spend more" no matter which administration or DoD leadership is at the helm. This trend is on display following last week's Trump firing of Secretary of Defense Mark Esper, and his replacement with Christopher C. Miller.
An ambitious plan to greatly expand the number of ships in America's naval arsenal put in place by Esper will not be impacted by the latest dramatic turnover in top Pentagon leadership, as Military.com reports:
USS Roosevelt via US NavyPlans to build a 500-ship Navy are still intact as the Trump administration ushered in a host of new leaders at the Pentagon this week - though the top admiral overseeing shipbuilding says challenges remain.
Battle Force 2045, Defense Secretary Mark Esper's ambitious plan to nearly double the size of the Navy fleet, is still underway. Esper was fired by President Donald Trump's this week, and several new civilian leaders were installed to replace him and other top policy staffers.
While China for example has many more total naval ships than the United States, the US Navy is still unrivaled in the total size and technological advantage of its force, given it has nearly a dozen large nuclear-powered fleet carriers and a handful of others that can be deemed carriers, compared to China's two.
Esper's plan calls for an active 500-ship fleet by 2045.
Vice Adm. William Galinis, the head of Naval Sea Systems Command, recently told reporters that nothing will change in terms of Esper's plan for naval expansion:
"I don't see any change to that right now," Galinis said. "We'll have to see how things play out over the next several weeks here, but I don't see any change."
"The underlying analytics and the requirements [of Battle Force 2045], I think, remain sound," Galinis said at a Thursday defense conference. "How we meet those requirements, that's a topic for further discussion."
Esper's ambitious plan also calls for the construction of three Virginia-class submarines per year, including 140 and 240 unmanned ships, which in prior statements he said was necessary to counter growing Chinese and Russian maritime expansion of their fleets.
Adm. Galinis said there may be "capacity challenges" in terms of such rapid ship-building:
"In terms of the industrial base's ability to build those ships, I think there are some capacity challenges out there," he said. "... Especially when we start talking about maybe going to three Virginias a year, and what it takes to transition from to two to three per year.
"There's some capacity issues not just within the shipyard, but the supply base as well."
In September the now former Defense Secretary Esper touted that the US maintains complete naval superiority over China and that the latter will never close the gap.
He said at the time time, "I want to make clear that China cannot match the United States when it comes to naval power."
The military industrial complex must be destroyed.
In the age of low cost drones and missiles are high cost tanks and ships easy targets?
The military industrial complex must be destroyed.
__________________________________________________
Yeah....don’t we already have 10 or 11 carrier groups?
And just think, that POS Esper was behind this buildup. You just know the navy was going to be used to push Wokeness around the globe.
But what about the Biden Plan for a 50 Ship Navy?
If Biden steals the election, his masters in Beijing will not let this happen.
I don’t think the US Navy currently has enough competant captains to get that many ships out to sea without crashing into each other and any other vessel within 500 nautical miles
So many weird comments on FR these days.
PING
Russia Red China, DPRK North Korea, Iran
agrees with you 10000% as does Congresswoman AOC and the entire communist socialist progressive marixist Alt-left.
Such ambitious, long term, expensive plans are not possible when Nancy Pelosi controls the purse. If she does agree it means conservatives will have conceeded on other important issues regarding social issues or bailing out failed states. I would suggest we build more capable drones which could likely be fitted into a budget that won’t require supporting the liberal agenda.
How is my comment weird?
Biden wins:
500 ship plan canceled to pay for mass emigration and benefits;
all military assets sold or auctioned off to pay for Green New Deal.
Trump wins:
500 ship plan accelerated. Both US naval shipyards begin the build out, scheduled to be complete before the end of the century;
ships built will each cost many 10s of billions;
10% of the classes built will go to scrap in 3 years;
10% will require billions more than budgeted to complete and then become training ships;
10% will be so high tech that they will be unworkable and non-survivable except on paper;
To help pay for this, all training will be conducted on the job;
Heavy emphasis will be given to recruiting gay, lesbian, transsexuals, and so on;
Routine maintenance will be delayed until rust is visible over 3/4ths of each ship;
Upgrades will need at least 3-4 years down time per ship, plus sea trials etc.
500 ships?
Wasn't Reagan's goal 600 ships?
That type of warfare is obsolete. Didn’t they get the memo? Or are we going to fight more wars against POC that haven’t invaded us?
Thanks, demon rats for electing the war party again.
Plans to build a 500-ship Navy are still intact
Biden would squelch those plans within days of inauguration. He would also perform a post-birth abortion on the Space Force.
Imagine if all those ship yards were converted into
making Starships for the Space Force.
Elon Musk SecSpaDef.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.