Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dp0622

Success is looking unlikely despite all the calls to avoid “defeatism.” The Supreme Court can’t just change the election because it wants to, there needs to be actual proof of fraud in amounts big enough to change the results. And not proof from conspiracy sites, unnamed sources or tweets, actual proof from actual people who testify under oath at court.


12 posted on 11/14/2020 8:37:57 AM PST by PATed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: PATed

Can’t the Supreme Court look at these states and say state officials did not follow election laws for each state, therefore any ballots counted under those illegal orders be thrown out?


18 posted on 11/14/2020 9:00:41 AM PST by philippa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: PATed

Which they are getting by the hundreds! But the real fact isn’t the fraud issue, it is the issue that the PA Supreme Law broke Federal Law by allowing voting 3 days after the election. They rewrote what only the Legislative can write, voting law.


30 posted on 11/14/2020 9:31:12 AM PST by fortheDeclaration
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: PATed
Tell me Pat, what's a Soros shill earning these days?

Do you really expect upwards of 75M heavily-armed citizens to just "lay back and enjoy it"?

50 posted on 11/14/2020 10:07:45 AM PST by Aevery_Freeman (Freedom Is In Peril! Defend it with your life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson