Posted on 11/14/2020 5:47:08 AM PST by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas
Matt Braynard and his wife had planned to be in the Dominican Republic, but right now, this is where Im needed, he said on YouTube on Nov. 8.
Braynard has assembled a team to look for inconsistencies in the six contested statesPennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan, Wisconsin, Arizona, and Nevada.
So far, theyve identified 1.25 million voter issues that theyre following up on through phone calls and against other databases.
The largest issue theyve found so far is with voters who had submitted a National Change of Address form to the post office indicating they moved out of state, yet appear to have voted in 2020 in the state they moved from.
Were calling them to confirm whether or not they actually cast the ballot, or if that ballot was cast by somebody else in their name, Braynard told The Epoch Times.
(Excerpt) Read more at theepochtimes.com ...
Is it already too late (evidence destroyed and GA will "certify" votes on Wednesday)?
The phones in nursing homes will be ringing like crazy!
Better ask Democrat Joe Biden.
Democrat Candidate Joe Biden, himself, asserted that "they" have put together
"the most extensive and inclusive voter fraud organization in the history of American politics.
So Democrat Joe Biden and his fellow Democrats have all the details WRT the Democrats' voter fraud organization.
===============================
REFERENCE: How Much Fraud Could There Be?
American Thinker.com ^ | November 14, 2020 | Anthony J. Ciani / FR Posted on 11/14/2020, 8:27:06 AM by Kaslin
Many have dismissed election fraud based on claims that there is no fraud, that the amount is small and incapable of changing results, and that the amount required to change results would necessitate an easily discovered coordinated effort.
Three months ago, these same people claimed that President Trump would steal the election through fraud.
They produced nothing to back their assertions, but they could have made estimates to show the minimal capacity for fraud. How much fraud could there be, and can it be corrected before the vote is certified?
If election officials are in on the fraud, as the news about Dominion and the exposed shenanigans imply, it could be so extreme that 90 of 100 people vote for Trump and 100 votes are certified for Biden. There would be 90 angry people saying, I voted for Trump, but fraud committed by election officials is almost impossible to correct.
The FBI has election crimes branches in all of its offices, but as Richard Pilger lamented, had a 40-year-old policy of investigating fraud after certification. Attorney General William Barr recently changed that policy, but probably too little too late.
Corrupt elections are eventually audited, forensically investigated, and proven, and people go to jail. I have heard dozens of retired Chicago employees brag about their role in frauding Kennedy into the presidency.
The subsequent indictment of 677 officials adds credibility to their claims. Chicago saw 100,000 fraudulent votes fabricated in the 1982 Illinois elections, thanks again to corrupt election officials who went to jail. Philadelphia, presently at the center of attention, also has its share of corrupt election officials. (Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
Of course what legal standing does the “Election Data Center” have? If Georgia certifies, the road to victory becomes more difficult.
. . . as well as the phones in cemeteries!
It has no legal standing, but if it finds something useful that could help entities who do have power, if those entities are willing to take on the system.
Show us the ballots too, that each district voting machine has the correct ballots for that district. I was directed to put my ballot in to a voting machine marked for the correct Precinct and ward.
If any ballots, including mail-in, were put into the voting machine of an incorrect district, precinct or ward, does the machine accept it, reject it, or only count the vote it can read on the scan? Who tested this system, and gave it a pass and what was their test and results? Compare then and now to see the system results are not plagued with any miscalculations or anomalies.
Biden's puppeteers will make all their puppets say that such measures are unnecessary and we don't have time anyway.
The phone at the graveyard office will be ringing incessantly.
How the Georgia senate election will be stolen.
From the article:
“The largest issue theyve found so far is with voters who had submitted a National Change of Address form to the post office indicating they moved out of state, yet appear to have voted in 2020 in the state they moved from.”
That is one of the sources of fraud.
The post office database.
I think the fraudsters got ahold of it and used it to create the faked ballots with only Joe’s name marked.
Question:
How secure is that database, who normally has access?
If only a post office employee, then that part of the fraud was an inside job.
The ballots that would be different would likely mass together and be easy to identify as different races in the down ballot choices.
I hope you’re wrong about Georgia certifying. The deceptive actions of the Fulton County officials make the results in that county’s results questionable.
To solve this for the people of Georgia, these folks need to be placed under oath in a court and forced to justify their actions. I cannot think of any legitimate reason, considering the circumstances of a hotly contested election, that you would not want the opposing side there. You have a huge pile of ballots and considering the county the majority are for your candidate, why ruin your moment of glory as you legitimately count your way to victory?
So, we are to believe whoever gave this order thought:
“I’m not going to let the R’s know we’re still counting. No good reason, other than just to avoid the hassle of having them around. Could this cause a problem? Well, maybe, but if so it will just throw our victory into doubt and make me look bad, so why not?”
That’s why I am sure something criminal happened.
These guys purchased the database so the other side could to.
At that moment that screenshot showed 83% in in GA and 82% in in WI but the current totals (which may include cheating or errors of one form or another) seem to be higher than estimated. If the current totals in GA and WI are legit, that would have meant that Trump had 82% in GA and 80% in WI. Still. huge leads for Trump at that moment.
Maybe what I read was that the counties had to "certify" their current totals before starting a recount. I tried to read several news stories about it but it's still confusing for me.
I still don't know if this "recount" is going to examine the signatures and postmarks.
we have entered the time of WRoL... without rule of law
If the President needs help I'm sure there are plenty of Freepers willing to make calls.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.