Posted on 11/10/2020 5:45:55 AM PST by ToxicMich
How do you explain all of these states stopping the counting and at the same time?
Yup...sounds like Fox News talking points. Now, if Hannity were to say what Tucker did, that would be even more obvious.
I’ll wait for Rush to say it
Bingo! In teaching Sunday School some years back I cautioned against sacrificing biblical morality to protect a paycheck. I called it Mammon Worship. Perhaps Tucker joined the Church of Mammon and exited the Church of Christ.
Hes wrong.
Perhaps the fraud we have found so far might not have been enough tilt election (maybe - were finding an awful lot), but more fraud is being found all the time.
And ANY fraud is too much.
It is about damn time we put vote fraud under a microscope.
As another poster commented above: “Let’s go to the Tape!”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R5ki6S-WsKU&feature=youtu.be
Conservatives could go on a spending strike. That would definitely affect GDP.
NO - Tucker is not being required by the higher ups to say anything. He's being responsible. We hate when CNN and MSNBC lies... it would be wrong for Tucker to make any conclusion as with whether or not the results will hold or not.
“Tucker is a sellout”
You are full of it.
Troll freak.
I didnt hear him say that. This quote must be out of context.
They all stopped counting!!!! Why????
Newsweek seems to have a problem with the meanings of words. So going to help them out:
"Might not alter the election" is a statement of possibility in an epistemic modality...that is a "as far as we can tell" type statement. And the subject of the statement is whether or not the election outcome will be overturned.
"There's Not Enough Fraud to Change Election Results" is not a statement of epistemic possibility, and its subject is ambiguous. It could mean the same as the subject of the subject of the other statement, that remedies of the vote fraud will not overcome the outcome, or it could mean that if the vote fraud were perfectly adjusted for that this would not change the outcome.
If Newsweek can not see the significant change of meaning here, then I have grave doubts as to their competence and reliability as journalists.
It only has to suggest "uncertainty."
In the presence of "uncertainty" the Legislature decides........ not a court.
==============================
NOTE: The relevant states evidencing voter fraud have Republican legislatures.
He didn’t say it. Newsweek is lying again. Always verify anything from the known lying media
Well Done. :)
Not that I care about Tucker, or any of the talking heads.
Why did he keep having a split-screen of a giant photo of biden throughout his show? That was repulsive.
Wow! Megyn Kelly said the same exact thing on Greg Kellys Newsmax show last night.
Every American is guaranteed a free and fair election under the constitution. The burden of proof is on the states to prove that happened.
They are the ones on trial and they should have to produce evidence it did. Not the other way around.
The Dems knew that a large percentage of their sheeple who would normally not vote in person would happily take the time to send vote by mail. Especially in light of the fact that (1) they didn’t have to request it and (2) USPS will deliver your ballot with insufficient postage, or none at all! That did it.
Well, Tucker, tat may be true. But, if any level of fraud is allowed and there is no penalty tot he one who committed it (Democrats), then why should we bother with elections in the future? Without some kind of retribution for fraud our national elections, President, Senate, House, will be meaningless. Granted, if they are meaningless we won’t ever have to live thru this kind of BS again. But then of course, Venezuelans haven’t had to live thru any frustrating elections in a couple of decades. So there is that upside, I guess.
I and a full-on Trump supporter (see my tagline) but in truth, President Trump is the just one president. There will hopefully be many more. But if we don’t pursue and prosecute any of these fraud reports, the fraudsters will own us for many years to come until we, the people decide we’ve finally had enough. How long might that take?
In before the ZOT.
I smell ozone.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.