Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tucker Carlson Says There's Not Enough Fraud to Change Election Results: 'We Should Be Honest'
Newsweek ^ | 11-10-20 | JACOB JARVIS

Posted on 11/10/2020 5:45:55 AM PST by ToxicMich

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 241-256 next last
To: dware

How do you explain all of these states stopping the counting and at the same time?


61 posted on 11/10/2020 6:02:53 AM PST by sasafras (WHEN YOU USE PAYPAL YOU GIVE MONEY TO GEORGE SOROS - TAKE A STAND AND CLOSE YOUR PP ACCOUNT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: CondoleezzaProtege

Yup...sounds like Fox News talking points. Now, if Hannity were to say what Tucker did, that would be even more obvious.


62 posted on 11/10/2020 6:03:01 AM PST by hsmomx3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ToxicMich

I’ll wait for Rush to say it


63 posted on 11/10/2020 6:03:22 AM PST by pangaea6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CondoleezzaProtege

Bingo! In teaching Sunday School some years back I cautioned against sacrificing biblical morality to protect a paycheck. I called it Mammon Worship. Perhaps Tucker joined the Church of Mammon and exited the Church of Christ.


64 posted on 11/10/2020 6:04:02 AM PST by TheConservativeBanker ($;)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Little Ray

He’s wrong.
Perhaps the fraud we have found so far might not have been enough tilt election (maybe - we’re finding an awful lot), but more fraud is being found all the time.
And ANY fraud is too much.
It is about damn time we put vote fraud under a microscope.


Who is wrong. You are saying exactly what Tucker did.

As another poster commented above: “Let’s go to the Tape!”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R5ki6S-WsKU&feature=youtu.be


65 posted on 11/10/2020 6:04:20 AM PST by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: NicoDon

Conservatives could go on a spending strike. That would definitely affect GDP.


66 posted on 11/10/2020 6:04:42 AM PST by Crucial
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: ToxicMich
First... Tucker is exactly right. MIGHT is the operative rule. All of the facts aren't known. There are some factual things that raise concerns; not allowing poll watchers, not allowing observers in the count rooms, other affidavits of wrongdoing, but that is not dispositive evidence that Trump wins and Biden loses.

NO - Tucker is not being required by the higher ups to say anything. He's being responsible. We hate when CNN and MSNBC lies... it would be wrong for Tucker to make any conclusion as with whether or not the results will hold or not.

67 posted on 11/10/2020 6:04:47 AM PST by Heff (The voting system is rigged!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CalWildcat

“Tucker is a sellout”

You are full of it.

Troll freak.


68 posted on 11/10/2020 6:05:03 AM PST by Eddie01 (V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: ToxicMich

I didn’t hear him say that. This quote must be out of context.


69 posted on 11/10/2020 6:05:04 AM PST by Dr. Scarpetta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pangaea6

They all stopped counting!!!! Why????


70 posted on 11/10/2020 6:05:10 AM PST by sasafras (WHEN YOU USE PAYPAL YOU GIVE MONEY TO GEORGE SOROS - TAKE A STAND AND CLOSE YOUR PP ACCOUNT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: ToxicMich
Fox News' Tucker Carlson has conceded that allegations of fraud which he suggested can be confirmed might not alter the election outcome—though insisted that is not the sole reason to pursue them.

Newsweek seems to have a problem with the meanings of words. So going to help them out:

"Might not alter the election" is a statement of possibility in an epistemic modality...that is a "as far as we can tell" type statement. And the subject of the statement is whether or not the election outcome will be overturned.

"There's Not Enough Fraud to Change Election Results" is not a statement of epistemic possibility, and its subject is ambiguous. It could mean the same as the subject of the subject of the other statement, that remedies of the vote fraud will not overcome the outcome, or it could mean that if the vote fraud were perfectly adjusted for that this would not change the outcome.

If Newsweek can not see the significant change of meaning here, then I have grave doubts as to their competence and reliability as journalists.

71 posted on 11/10/2020 6:05:19 AM PST by AndyTheBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Evidence of unreliable vote results do not have to be at a level to convince a court of law.

It only has to suggest "uncertainty."

In the presence of "uncertainty" the Legislature decides........ not a court.

==============================

NOTE: The relevant states evidencing voter fraud have Republican legislatures.

72 posted on 11/10/2020 6:05:33 AM PST by Liz (Our side has 8 trillion bullets; the other side doesn't know which bathroom to use.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BiteYourSelf

He didn’t say it. Newsweek is lying again. Always verify anything from the known lying media


73 posted on 11/10/2020 6:05:44 AM PST by Betty Jane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: EEGator

Well Done. :)

Not that I care about Tucker, or any of the talking heads.


74 posted on 11/10/2020 6:06:03 AM PST by MotorCityBuck ( Keep the change, you filthy animal! ,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: ToxicMich

Why did he keep having a split-screen of a giant photo of biden throughout his show? That was repulsive.


75 posted on 11/10/2020 6:06:14 AM PST by KKDucMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ToxicMich

Wow! Megyn Kelly said the same exact thing on Greg Kelly’s Newsmax show last night.


76 posted on 11/10/2020 6:06:15 AM PST by j.argese (/s tags: If you have a mind unnecessary. If you're a cretin it really doesn't matter, does it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ToxicMich

Every American is guaranteed a free and fair election under the constitution. The burden of proof is on the states to prove that happened.

They are the ones on trial and they should have to produce evidence it did. Not the other way around.


77 posted on 11/10/2020 6:06:17 AM PST by angmo (#joeknew)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ToxicMich

The Dems knew that a large percentage of their sheeple who would normally not vote in person would happily take the time to send vote by mail. Especially in light of the fact that (1) they didn’t have to request it and (2) USPS will deliver your ballot with insufficient postage, or none at all! That did it.


78 posted on 11/10/2020 6:06:27 AM PST by sevinufnine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ToxicMich

Well, Tucker, tat may be true. But, if any level of fraud is allowed and there is no penalty tot he one who committed it (Democrats), then why should we bother with elections in the future? Without some kind of retribution for fraud our national elections, President, Senate, House, will be meaningless. Granted, if they are meaningless we won’t ever have to live thru this kind of BS again. But then of course, Venezuelans haven’t had to live thru any frustrating elections in a couple of decades. So there is that upside, I guess.

I and a full-on Trump supporter (see my tagline) but in truth, President Trump is the just one president. There will hopefully be many more. But if we don’t pursue and prosecute any of these fraud reports, the fraudsters will own us for many years to come until we, the people decide we’ve finally had enough. How long might that take?


79 posted on 11/10/2020 6:06:37 AM PST by Afterguard (Deplorable me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CalWildcat

In before the ZOT.

I smell ozone.


80 posted on 11/10/2020 6:06:38 AM PST by Eddie01 (V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 241-256 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson