[LS]

I suggest YOU read more.

Isolationism was massive and needed NO help from the left, at all. It was so big, the British infiltrated our polling orgs to try and change opinion (Thomas Mahl, “Dangerous Deception”). They failed.

The left was real, tiny, and irrelevant.

[Ancesthntr]

“Isolationism was massive and needed NO help from the left, at all. It was so big, the British infiltrated our polling orgs to try and change opinion (Thomas Mahl, “Dangerous Deception”). They failed.

The left was real, tiny, and irrelevant.”

---

As a political force, the Left was, indeed, pretty tiny and irrelevant in the 1940s, especially when compared to today. However, certain key Soviet agents or sympathizers close to FDR had more of an effect than is appreciated.

[wildcard_redneck]

”The left was real, tiny, and irrelevant.“

None are so blind as those who will not see.

If the left was so tiny then why did all the major newspapers, particularly the New York Times, work so hard in the early 30s to cover up Stalin’s Holodomor genocide in in Ukraine?

Read about the 1919 Anarchist Bombings:
“ seven U.S. cities, on the evening of June 2, 1919, all within approximately 90 minutes of one another, bombs of extraordinary capacity rocked some of the biggest urban areas in America, including New York; Boston; Pittsburgh; Cleveland; Washington; D.C.m Philadelphia; and Patterson, New Jersey. The bombings were a concerted effort among U.S. based anarchists who were most likely disciples of Luigi Galleani, a vehemently radical anarchist who advocated violence as a means to effect change to rid the world of laws and capitalism.”
https://www.legendsofamerica.com/ah-1919bombings/

Does that not seem similar to Antifa?