Ouch.
Some people are obviously talking because those are pretty specific allegations.
However, the media will say this is not evidence. Funny for a bunch of people who ran wild with the Russian collusion delusion for years to demand such concrete evidence isn’t it?
They overplayed their hand in this election. While courts are hesitant to get involved in elections as a state matter, the Federal courts cannot ignore violations of state law because the constitution gives the state legislature the ability to set the rules. They were NOT followed.
They’re talking. They don’t want to go to jail for Biden’
It would appear to be first hand observance. What they did to prevent observation is certainly prima facia evidence of fraud and an honest judge would see it that way. Remember this doesn't have to go to a jury for a decision, a trial would come after that.
...pretty specific allegations....
__________________________________________
They have signed sworn affidavits backed up by observers, video, audio and similar observations, similarly sworn and substantiated in multiple venues. The technological violations are explained by numerous fact experts, complete with diagrams any non-techie can follow, backed up with video and photos.
This single lawsuit is 78 pages. The others are equally voluminous. 50-60 plaintiffs in one case. One could extrapolate that they have similar numbers in each of the many others across 6-7 states.
The word *systemic* is powerful. This is disenfranchisement.
People were systematically denied a vote based on exercising their free choice. Some people were privileged above others. Federal Laws were applied differently within states and between states. The Constitution was not followed.
The media can say the moon is made of green cheese. That is not moot. The SCOTUS rules on Constitutional violations. There are enough of those in enough venues to constitute evidence in multiple cases.
14th Amendment.
Civil Rights Act of 1964 (the 1st sentence of which specifically references voting rights)