>>Once again you miss a point. There are two separate frauds.<<
Maybe I do. I’m no lawyer. But, from the definition of fraud: “The purpose is to gain something of value, usually money, by misleading or deceiving someone into believing something that the perpetrator knows to be false.”
No one believed anything the Dems asserted about election procedures, but many now seem to be accepting the results of what was very likely a fraudulent election.
They broke election laws right and left. Obviously, their purpose in breaking them was to convince everyone that Biden got more votes than he did. That was the fraud, assuming it actually occurred. Proving it occurred will be harder than proving that election laws were violated, which is my point. Get them on that and hold a do-over election in those cities because potential fraud was enabled. Of course, it helps the case if people who committed fraudulent voting testify to that effect or can be shown to have done so, but that might not be necessary is all I’m saying.
Verifying each ballot and observing the count was a legal right.