Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bigtigermike
That's a pretty hard and fast violation of law right there. More and more we find to what extent the vote pool was contaminated, and un-undoable ... by design of course.

Some things lead me to believe, if I'm a judge, I have to say the pool was poisoned, and to a degree that could determine the winner ... and therefore ... what? Re-vote in some states? What other solution is there if it's determined based on a preponderance of the evidence that the fraud and so called 'irregularities' were enough to alter the outcome, yet the legit ballots can't be separated out from the contaminated ballots?

7 posted on 11/07/2020 7:40:06 PM PST by tinyowl (A is A)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: tinyowl

Revoting wont work

The same cheagers are stil going o be overseeing the revote

You cant let them control the revote


11 posted on 11/07/2020 7:43:00 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not Averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: tinyowl

You will never get a re-vote on a Presidential Election. Why? Doing so would mean the undermining of our great republic has been so corrupted that a valid election could not possibly take place and that the first vote was fraudulent to the core. The United States would then be labeled as a corrupt country along with a long line of corrupt country. The powers that be are blind and/or have participated in this corruption. That is why there will never be a recount even though one is warranted given the preponderance of evidence that has come forth.


19 posted on 11/07/2020 7:53:48 PM PST by zaxtres
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: tinyowl
What other solution is there if it's determined based on a preponderance of the evidence that the fraud and so called 'irregularities' were enough to alter the outcome, yet the legit ballots can't be separated out from the contaminated ballots?

Decertify the election and let the legislature exercise its Article II Section 1 power to select the new method of choosing electors, namely by direct appointment from the legislature itself.

The alternative is to exercise the 14th amendment's Section 2 penalty to strip the state of its House representation in proportion to the amount of fraudulent votes.

-PJ

24 posted on 11/07/2020 8:03:15 PM PST by Political Junkie Too (Freedom of the press is the People's right to publish, not CNN's right to the 1st question.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: tinyowl

If it is unverifiable by design, and can’t be unraveled, it must be revoted.


37 posted on 11/07/2020 8:28:17 PM PST by The_Media_never_lie (If this election is fraudulent, why would anyone think the next election would be fair?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: tinyowl

Void the damned election, with a high volume shout out to those responsible.


39 posted on 11/07/2020 8:30:38 PM PST by MortMan (Shouldn't "palindrome" read the same forward and backward?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: tinyowl

In that case, the Republican legislature can choose its own slate of electors, with the approval of Professor Evers 100% unnecessary, per the U.S. Constitution.


42 posted on 11/07/2020 8:33:16 PM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Hope is not a plan. -- Matthew Bracken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: tinyowl

The only real choice is to potentially toss out “poisoned” districts. Anywhere fraud is found, nix the results. Don’t call them for one candidate or the other, but use the results of the untouched districts and counties.

People’s legit votes won’t be counted, but that would be the fault of the election judges. When you can’t determine which is fraud and which isn’t, or ballots went missing, that’s all that can be done.

It’s an awful option, but a re-vote is out of the question. Soldiers and citizens overseas can’t exactly cast a new ballot, and too many people are terrified of leaving their homes due to COVID. Despite that, there’s no guarantee people can get out of work to re-cast unless some sort of executive order is passed to treat the re-cast the same as election day.


51 posted on 11/08/2020 12:14:00 AM PST by Tacrolimus1mg (Do no harm, but take no sh!t.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: tinyowl
Some things lead me to believe, if I'm a judge, I have to say the pool was poisoned, and to a degree that could determine the winner ... and therefore ... what? Re-vote in some states? What other solution is there if it's determined based on a preponderance of the evidence that the fraud and so called 'irregularities' were enough to alter the outcome, yet the legit ballots can't be separated out from the contaminated ballots?

If a quick revote isn't an option, then all you can really do is decertify whichever batches include the fraudulent votes. They just get completely removed from the count.
63 posted on 11/08/2020 11:02:16 AM PST by Svartalfiar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson