Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Flick Lives

“It is not the counting of ballots already cast that is the issue, it’s an attempt by these states to continue to allow new ballots after Election Day is over.”

In his talk this morning Trump didn’t cite that, he cited only that the counting stopped while he was ahead. He emphasized that very strongly.

Also, I imagine the court would ask why he didn’t ask for intervention when the local/state governments announced the policy of accepting votes past a certain date. It’s been in the news for awhile.

But bottom line, you have to have a reason to ask for either a stoppage of vote counting or stopping the local govts from extending voting times. e.g. you have video of a boat bringing in illegal votes from China.


7,670 posted on 11/04/2020 12:32:56 AM PST by LouieFisk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7615 | View Replies ]


To: LouieFisk

The campaign did. The Supreme’s said there is no harm in keeping the votes for now. We can impound them later if there is a case. It is now later.


7,703 posted on 11/04/2020 12:47:22 AM PST by Smogger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7670 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson