In a previous career I did thousands of PCR runs and as a rule if anything you’re trying to detect requires more than 35 cycles you’re begging for trouble, even if you’re just doing research. I have no idea how anything over that would have ever become acceptable for clinical purposes. No, actually I do.
Kerry Mullis would agree with you if he were still alive. The PCR test inventor died of pneumonia last summer at age 74... in August when the first “cases” in China were appearing...or not. Maybe he was put on a ventilator to shut him up about how the PCR test is being misused to diagnose any infection. He was very outspoken, from what I hear.
https://cen.acs.org/people/obituaries/Kary-Mullis-dies-age-74/97/web/2019/08
The wikipedia entry is very disparaging but worth looking at, too, just to see the contortions to make Mullis appear unworthy to have an opinion on any matter except his field of expertise.
Hopefully, the next NYC “bombshell” that was knowable since February is the CDC report on the PCR Performance Analysis stating “NO SARS/COVID19 VIRUS ISOLATES WERE AVAILABLE” ... So that RNA glop on the Swab is worse than worthless. It’s 100% fraud. People need to be prosecuted for Crimes against Humanity.
The FDA demands that ALL diagnostic tests be validated for their intended purpose beforemthey can legally be used. Validation means providing scientific proof it detects the disease, with few, quantifiable errors.
PCR has NEVER been validated to diagnose Covid-19. Never! Why?
Because the FDA gave everyone waivers back in March/April. And never went back and insisted they validate now.
So we have a BS test, guiding life changing decisions, worldwide. The CDC and FDA are both swamp.
Has the test changed since June? Has the number of positive tests increased?
If the test is the same, but the number of positives has increased, does this indicate there is a resurgence?