[conservative98]

There are new details about the son and brother’s attempts to cut deals in China based on their family brand, but the key allegation is that Joe Biden himself was pulled into his son’s Chinese negotiations.

---

So do your job and start covering it!!!!!

[nathanbedford]

This isn’t proof that he partnered with Hunter or profited in any way, but it seems like evidence that he wasn’t particularly worried about keeping his son’s sketchy salesmanship at arm’s length.

Of course the Tony Bobulinski interview and the documents and audio that he offers in support of its contentions are proof.

The author confuses conclusive proof, proof beyond a reasonable doubt, proof by the preponderance of evidence with proof in general. There are several levels of "proof." By whatever standard of proof an apologist such as the author insists as his definition, there is more than mere conjecture that Joe Biden profited from his son's dealings, we have an email describing the cut that Joe Biden was personally to receive, to wit: 10%.

This is more than "interesting", this is proof that in this one deal out of many deals over several continents for several years Joe Biden was getting his vig. What about the rest of those deals?

As an offhand thought and by no means in support of the disreputable New York Times, perhaps this opinion piece was allowed onto the pages of the paper as the beginning of a CYA when the lid is inevitably blown off these crimes, providing Biden is not elected.