Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Health officials 'interpret Bible' for vaccine-objecting employee - Threatens 'discipline' for not following its guidance
World Net Daily ^ | 10/24/2020 | WND Staff

Posted on 10/24/2020 12:22:47 PM PDT by Maudeen

A dispute has erupted over a mandatory vaccine program for employees of the University of Virginia Health System because officials are requiring a worker to follow their interpretation of the Bible's requirements.

The worker would rather follow his own beliefs, not theirs.

The employee, whose name was not released, has submitted four requests for a religious accommodation to his bosses' order to be vaccinated for the flu.

He says his Christian beliefs don't allow it, citing biblical instructions not to be defiled with "harmful" substances.

He "cannot accept any vaccination that is derived from aborted fetal tissue, nor contribute to the bottom line of a manufacturer who sells vaccines that are derived from aborted fetal cells."

It's a matter of faith for him.

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: religion; rights
He "cannot accept any vaccination that is derived from aborted fetal tissue, nor contribute to the bottom line of a manufacturer who sells vaccines that are derived from aborted fetal cells."

Think about it!

1 posted on 10/24/2020 12:22:47 PM PDT by Maudeen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Maudeen

Morally, he is in the right, but practically, he may want to start updating his resume package.


2 posted on 10/24/2020 12:31:29 PM PDT by lee martell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maudeen

My body, my choice.


3 posted on 10/24/2020 12:31:43 PM PDT by exnavy (american by birth and choice, I love this country!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maudeen

They aren’t going to call 200,000 people with non-matching signatures. They are going to count the sham ballots, the vast majority of which will be Dem.

Tell the company it is against your Muslim beliefs. They’ll quite right down.


4 posted on 10/24/2020 12:33:12 PM PDT by Flick Lives (My work's illegal, but at least it's honest. - Capt. Malcolm Reynolds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maudeen
This is from the Childrens Hospital of Philadelphia: The fetal embryo fibroblast cells used to grow vaccine viruses were first obtained from elective termination of two pregnancies in the early 1960s. These same embryonic cells obtained from the early 1960s have continued to grow in the laboratory and are used to make vaccines today. No further sources of fetal cells are needed to make these vaccines.

I understand and respect the man's concience and choice. I'm not sure they needed tissue from aborted fetuses then. When I was in grad school in the 1980s, one of my lab mates wives worked in a biochem lab where they collected these compounds from placentas. The placenta is expelled from the mother's body after the birth, usually about 5 to 30 minutes after the baby is born.

At any rate, his choice to take a modern vaccine will not contribute to abortions today. Those choosing abortion today are not doing it to aid vaccine research.

5 posted on 10/24/2020 12:38:32 PM PDT by RetiredScientist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maudeen
The worker would rather follow his own beliefs, not theirs.

I agree with the worker. Not because of religion, but because it's my body and they can't force me to taint or alter my body as they see fit. My wife and I refuse to get flu vaccinations, always have, and we rarely get sick.

This is akin to an employer forcing someone to get a tattoo or piercing against their wishes. My body, my decision, isn't that what the pro-death abortion women believe?

6 posted on 10/24/2020 12:46:46 PM PDT by roadcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maudeen

I think each person should decide for themselves whether to take a vaccine or not.

Of course each business will decide their vaccination requirements for employees.

The rub between individual rights and business rights in this regard will get sorted out in the courts if that has not already taken place.


7 posted on 10/24/2020 12:58:01 PM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: roadcat

In the past, before COVID, as a hospital auxiliary volunteer, I could not work between the months of November and March unless I received the flu shot (which I can’t remember when I ever got one) or unless I wore a mask. Back then if I wore a mask, which I refused to do, it would signal to everyone I had something contagious. Today, I’m witnessing masked wearers (including food handlers, cashiers, stock replacers, and even health workers) constantly touching and rearranging their masks and then touching the consumers’ items or a patient/health care facility resident. Duh!


8 posted on 10/24/2020 1:03:27 PM PDT by Maudeen (Wake up true believers in Christ and VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Maudeen

Today, I’m witnessing masked wearers (including food handlers, cashiers, stock replacers, and even health workers) constantly touching and rearranging their masks and then touching the consumers’ items or a patient/health care facility resident. Duh!
- - -

Reminds me of the story of the chef.

He had a spoon on a string attached to his apron.

He would use this spoon to stir and taste his creations, etc.

One day he goes to pee. He manages to complete the action, but has to ‘re-holster’.

How do you do put things back, he was asked?

Oh, It’s easy, I use my spoon.


9 posted on 10/24/2020 1:18:09 PM PDT by Scrambler Bob (This is not /s. It is just as viable as any MSM 'information', maybe more so!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Maudeen
constantly touching and rearranging their masks and then touching the consumers’ items

Yes, we see that all the time. Last time taking our car in for service, the worker wearing the mask below his nose and constantly fidgeting with the mask, then handing the paperwork and pen to us. My wife carries a spray bottle and is constantly spraying our hands after dealing with others and touching stuff. At the bank, restaurants, stores, see this touching of masks and noses a lot. We're not pushy about others being careless, and take our risks being seniors but we're not going to be hermits. Workers are doing the minimum in following mask rules so as not to be fired. And even if they do wear masks, they're the wrong type and worn incorrectly. Each person needs to decide their own risk level and deal with it personally, and not have draconian rules foisted on them.

10 posted on 10/24/2020 1:26:39 PM PDT by roadcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: roadcat

Agreed. I hope businesses that require this will get sued out of existence!


11 posted on 10/24/2020 2:01:47 PM PDT by Phillyred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Maudeen

The Obamacare rule that tied vax compliance to Mcare reimbursement has not been lifted. Or wasn’t last time I checked. Today your healthcare is provided by people who are compliant in every regard, for cash.


12 posted on 10/24/2020 2:55:37 PM PDT by momincombatboots (Ephesians 6... who you are really at war with)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: plain talk

>The rub between individual rights and business rights in this regard will get sorted out in the courts if that has not already taken place.

And if it comes out “wrong”, you are back where you started - tying him down and forcing him to take it, but leaving his conscience clean. And there might be a “miracle” where he dies before the needle gets in.


13 posted on 10/24/2020 3:36:37 PM PDT by UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide (Reverse Wickard v Filburn (1942) - and - ISLAM DELENDA EST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RetiredScientist

Your explanation is the common narrative given by the vaccine industry. I don’t believe it. Catholic research groups have confirmed there is a continuous flow of aborted fetal cells used in vaccine research, development, and production. This explains why the groups go apoplectic whenever there is talk of outlawing fetal tissue use in research, or in ending abortion.


14 posted on 10/24/2020 6:33:51 PM PDT by Jan_Sobieski (Sanctification)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Jan_Sobieski

Can you provide links to credible support of those claims? I would like to investigate.


15 posted on 10/24/2020 6:35:33 PM PDT by RetiredScientist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Maudeen

I didn’t see cited the bible verses at the center of this issue.

I did read the WND article which cites the Federal law and the employee exception based on “religious belief or moral conviction.” There is his out right there — moral conviction.


16 posted on 10/25/2020 2:58:41 AM PDT by nonsporting (Sic semper tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson