Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: catnipman

What the paper concluded was that convalescent plasma worked in producing neutralizing antibodies that reduced the SARS-COV-2 viral load but both arms of the study had about the same mortality and other adverse effects. This was because other proteins in the human plasma caused blood clotting and cardiac events that led to negative outcomes.

This would not occur in monoclonal antibody therapies like Regeneron that are manufactured and do not contain all the other proteins in natural human plasma.

Convalescent plasma was considered an attractive therapy because it could be easily produced and would be available without FDA approval. It would probably work if patients were also given anticoagulents like Xarelto or Eliquis to reduce the coagulation risk but it would be better to use Regeneron’s drug which has no coagulation risk.


18 posted on 10/23/2020 6:54:16 PM PDT by Dave Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Dave Wright

“This would not occur in monoclonal antibody therapies like Regeneron that are manufactured and do not contain all the other proteins in natural human plasma.”

absolutely ... plus plasma has a very large number of other, non-covid components that can potentially cause all kinds of mischief ...

as far as i’m concerned, pure, semi-synthetic, standardized measures of monoclonal antibodies are going to be FAR safer and FAR more effective than whole, convalescent plasma obtained from random strangers ...


33 posted on 10/23/2020 9:33:13 PM PDT by catnipman (Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson