““When Merrick Garland was nominated, eight months before an election, we have to wait for an election. Now that an election is ongoing, we are rushing through this nomination. It is one of the worst moments the Senate has ever seen,” Schumer said.”
If you wanted to control the process you should have won the Senate, Chuckie. Elections have consequences, and it is NOT the case that Republican presidents are elected for three years and ‘Rats for five. If you should happen to win a majority in the Senate and the White House, you can talk. Just no more assassinating conservative Justices...
“If you wanted to control the process you should have won the Senate, Chuckie. Elections have consequences,”
Of course they will use that same argument to pack the court if they take control of house, senate, and presidency.
You know, Senator Schumer, after you used the extended timetable to smear Brett Michael Kavanaugh with ill-founded calumny, we decided thereafter to accelerate Senate confirmations of nominations to the Supreme Court. And considering that your own fellow Democrats couldn’t bring themselves to oppose Amy Coney Barret, she probably is the best qualified nominee in a long time. But remember what you did to Clarence Thomas, the greatest justice on the court? We won’t let it happen again.