Posted on 10/16/2020 12:13:58 PM PDT by billorites
It turns out Democrats arent as forgiving of elderly politicians as we might have thought. After several months of doing their best to ignore former Vice President Joe Bidens declining abilities and his unending string of inexplicable gaffes, Democrats have had it with one particular senior citizen: Sen. Dianne Feinstein.
In a story published by The New York Times the weekend before Judge Amy Coney Barretts confirmation hearings began, various sources within the party voiced no confidence in the California senators ability to lead Democrats efforts to stop the nomination. Like a previous article published last month in Politico, the point of the effort was to highlight a belief expressed by the two liberal outlets sources both on the record and anonymous that Feinstein is simply too old and lacks the mental and physical capacity to do her job.
There was more at play here, however, than just pointing out the inherent problem of having the Senates oldest member being on the firing line when Democrats feel they must have their sharpest and toughest advocates front and center in an effort to discredit Barrett and President Donald Trump. Both articles were also warning shots fired in Feinsteins direction.
Although there was no danger that Feinstein would be anything less than hostile to the conservative judge, leftist Democrats seemed to be saying that any deviation from the party line regarding their scorched-earth war against Trump and his nominee such as Feinsteins criticism of leftist plans to do away with the filibuster or to pack the Supreme Court would be harshly punished when Democrats hope to control the Senate next year.
Thats why leftist groups weighed in at the conclusion of the four days of Judiciary Committee hearings to demand that she be forced to step down as ranking member. Demand Justice, an advocacy group headed by former Hillary Clinton press secretary Brian Fallon, denounced her for treating Republicans with kid gloves. The evidence for this accusation was the collegial hug she gave Sen. Lindsey Graham, the committees chairman, for the way he handled the hearings.
She was performing an act of courtesy to an old colleague who had done his best to give both sides a fair shot at Barrett, even if Democrats were unhappy about the nomination. But in this era of politics being practiced as a form of a tribal culture war, nothing short of daggers-drawn advocacy can be tolerated. In the eyes of left-wingers like Fallon or a liberal group calling itself Fix Our Senate, the only explanations for friendly behavior to the other party are senility or treason. Feinstein Isnt Unique in Her Frailty
Although Feinstein is the oldest senator, shes hardly the only senior citizen. She is one of eight members who are at least 80 and one of 29 who are at least 70. The Senate has a long tradition of tolerating members who were clearly in decline, with Republican Strom Thurmond lingering in the Senate until he was 100 years old and Democrat Robert Byrd dying in office at age 92, when both were long past the point of effective service.
But the idea of the Senate as the worlds most exclusive club, which always protected its members from accountability about their age or personal misconduct, with the late Sen. Ted Kennedy being the most outrageous example, seems to be one more relic of a discarded past. In an age of hyper-partisan warfare in which every senator, especially committee chairs, are expected to act as participants in an all-out culture war rather than collegial members of a deliberative body, toleration of diminished members or those who are out of touch with the spirit of the times might no longer be put up with.
The carping about Feinstein seems fundamentally unfair at a time the partys presidential nominee has labored, sometimes with great difficulty, to withstand the rigors of the campaign. Although talk of Bidens senility might be overstated, no one who observed closely in the past can pretend his difficulties in keeping facts straight and speaking either extemporaneously or from a teleprompter can honestly say his current performance is not diminished from what it once was.
Like Biden, Feinstein is not quite as sharp as she used to be when speaking to the public or reporters or questioning witnesses in committee hearings. During the first day of Barretts questioning by the Judiciary Committee, Feinstein followed the same script that other Democrats were reciting throughout the hearings, which sought to refocus the discussion from judicial issues to partisan talking points about preserving Obamacare.
At one point, she interjected a mention of Roe v. Wade in the middle of a discussion about gun control cases. Barrett responded with a quizzical look, but then the conversation got back on course with no further stumbles on Feinsteins part. While Feinsteins performance was far from impressive, it was no worse than that of the other two most senior members of the committee, Republican Sen. Chuck Grassley or Democratic Sen. Patrick Leahy. Democrats Pile on Feinstein
The sniping at Feinstein was both curious and ironic. Feinstein might take a dim view of the plans of radicals to blow up the system should the Democrats take complete control of the government in 2021, but there was no chance she would express sympathy or support for Barrett.
Indeed, Feinstein probably can take the most credit for Barretts elevation to the high court than anyone other than Trump. It was Feinsteins unfair questioning during Barretts confirmation hearing for her 2017 appointment to the court of appeals that made the judge a conservative folk hero. Feinsteins questions seemed to be saying that Barretts Catholic faith would render her unsuitable for high office because the churchs dogma lives loudly within you.
By crossing over the line with comments that seemed to be advocating an unconstitutional religious test for office, Feinstein effectively robbed Democrats of their ability to hint at prejudice against Christian conservatives while retaining plausible deniability about such prejudice.
Yet in making that point, Feinstein was speaking for many Democrats, as the effort to smear Barrett as an extremist or a religious nutcase during the last month makes plain. Moreover, it was very much in line with other grillings of Republican nominees, such as Sen. Kamala Harriss questioning of Brian Buescher, a candidate for a federal district judgeship, about his membership in the Knights of Columbus.
While Feinsteins comments were inappropriate, it is more than a little unfair for her party to think her comments were the result of early-onset senility rather than an expression of the views most of its members uphold. That was further illustrated by a hot mic moment on the fourth day of the hearings when, Feinstein, not realizing she was being recorded, doubled down on her attack on Barretts religion.
Shes been pro-life for a long time, Feinstein said. So I suspect with her, its deeply personal and comes with her religion.
Catholics arent the only Americans who oppose the Democrats insistence on legal and government-funded abortions up until the moment of birth, but to Feinstein the way to make it sound deplorable is to link it to the judges faith.
The Politico and Times articles also seemed to blame Feinstein for the belated revelations of unsubstantiated accusations of sexual misconduct against Justice Brett Kavanaugh in 2018. As unfair and inappropriate as Feinsteins actions were, however, they were not due to her age or infirmity but were part of a calculated Democratic attempt to derail the Kavanaugh nomination. The Senior Senator Just Isnt Radical Enough
Leftist Democrats real beef with Feinstein isnt her attitude toward Barrett, its the independent streak that has always characterized her Senate career.
Feinsteins opposition to ending the filibuster is a genuine threat to her partys hopes to ram through a host of radical measures next year if they get a Senate majority and win the White House. If enough moderate Democrats go along with her, that would stop their leader Sen. Chuck Schumer from taking the next step toward abolishing a measure that would otherwise prevent them from packing the Supreme Court with leftist justices and admitting the District of Columbia and even Puerto Rico as states, which would enable them to ensure their domination over the government for the foreseeable future.
Nor has anyone on the left forgotten her viral moment with a group of schoolchildren who arrived at Feinsteins office to lecture her about supporting the Green New Deal. The crotchety senator had no patience for listening to ultimatums from middle-schoolers and instead lectured them about politics being the art of the possible rather than my way or the highway. That, as much as anything, demonstrates just what Feinstein thinks about the younger generation of Democrats.
Thus, the whispering campaign against the senator, amplified by articles in leftist publications, isnt so much about her being more impaired than other Democrats, let alone their presidential nominee, but about their reliability in sticking to whatever the party line of the moment might be.
It is Feinsteins potential for heresy against the new liberal orthodoxy that is causing some in her party to threaten to take away her status as a ranking member or to serve as a chair if the Democrats are in the majority in January, not her age. After all, if Biden wins in November, Democrats are counting on a president they can control and are wanting a senator they can crush.
good... I always enjoy seeing the enemy eat their own.
Dianne tell them to get stuffed and vote for Amy
Feinstein should have accused Barrett of smuggling nuclear weapons. The press would have bought into it 100%.
They act like kids on a playground
Im looking at this fienstien charactor and she reminds me of a 1920 wooden puppet
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.