My first thought was Hirono is crazy. My second thought was, now that they have ACB on record saying she’s never sexually harassed anyone, who will they be trotting out to say she harassed them.
Bingo. This was a set-up to allow them to trot out their latest paid liar.
“Lots of Catholic Priests have been convicted of being molesters So golly, ALL Catholics must do it.”
These are sick, twisted people.
The Democrats are stalling for time hoping they can delay the hearings until after the election, but one way or another Judge Barrett will be confirmed. That said, the usual RINO suspects Collins, Murkowski, Mittens and a few others will be worked on by the RATs behind the scenes to alter their vote.
They could pull the same ting they did with Kavanaugh, pull someone out of their butt that says she was harrassed by ACB. Maybe a gay woman will say (in a vocal-fry voice) ACB said bad things about her.
...and once they've found the right person to cast in that part, the Dems will immediately start screaming that ACB committed perjury during her testimony and should not be confirmed.
“Mr Appypappy, how long ago did Amy sexually harass you?”
“About $20,000 ago.”
...who will they be trotting out to say she harassed them.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Someone with a convoluted definition of sexual harrassment that does not rise to the trm as currently used and understood.
Like the fake remonstrations over “Gender preference”.